[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7d8cfcf5-08db-4712-a98f-2cbfb9beeb85@mandelbit.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 21:52:05 +0200
From: Antonio Quartulli <antonio@...delbit.com>
To: Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Wilczyński <kwilczynski@...nel.org>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Karthikeyan Mitran <m.karthikeyan@...iveil.co.in>,
Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@....com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>, Pali Rohár
<pali@...nel.org>, "K . Y . Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>, Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>, Joyce Ooi <joyce.ooi@...el.com>,
Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@...il.com>,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@...nel.org>,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>, Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>, Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@...iatek.com>,
Jianjun Wang <jianjun.wang@...iatek.com>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@...il.com>,
Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>,
Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara@...rochip.com>,
Nirmal Patel <nirmal.patel@...ux.intel.com>,
Jonathan Derrick <jonathan.derrick@...ux.dev>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/16] PCI: vmd: Switch to msi_create_parent_irq_domain()
Hi Nam,
On 26/06/2025 16:48, Nam Cao wrote:
[...]
> -static void vmd_msi_free(struct irq_domain *domain,
> - struct msi_domain_info *info, unsigned int virq)
> +static void vmd_msi_free(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq, unsigned int nr_irqs)
> {
> struct vmd_irq *vmdirq = irq_get_chip_data(virq);
>
> - synchronize_srcu(&vmdirq->irq->srcu);
> + for (int i = 0; i < nr_irqs; ++i) {
> + synchronize_srcu(&vmdirq->irq->srcu);
>
> - /* XXX: Potential optimization to rebalance */
> - scoped_guard(raw_spinlock_irq, &list_lock)
> - vmdirq->irq->count--;
> + /* XXX: Potential optimization to rebalance */
> + scoped_guard(raw_spinlock_irq, &list_lock)
> + vmdirq->irq->count--;
>
> - kfree(vmdirq);
> + kfree(vmdirq);
> + }
By introducing a for loop in this function, you are re-using vmdirq
after free'ing it.
I can't send a patch because I am not faimliar with this API and I don't
know how to fix it.
However, the issue was reported today by Coverity.
Any idea? :-)
Regards,
--
Antonio Quartulli
CEO and Co-Founder
Mandelbit Srl
https://www.mandelbit.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists