[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <568bd74b-10a5-42cc-b71d-0c42a7b59297@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 14:00:16 +0200
From: Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-spdx@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] LICENSES: Replace the obsolete address of the FSF
On 16/07/2025 13.38, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 07:45:48AM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> From: Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>
>>
>> The FSF does not reside in the Franklin street anymore. Let's update
>> the address with the link to their website, as suggested in the latest
>> revisions of their licenses.
>> (See https://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0.txt for example)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>
>> ---
>> LICENSES/deprecated/GPL-1.0 | 6 +++---
>> LICENSES/preferred/GPL-2.0 | 10 ++++------
>> LICENSES/preferred/LGPL-2.0 | 5 ++---
>> LICENSES/preferred/LGPL-2.1 | 8 ++++----
>> 4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/LICENSES/deprecated/GPL-1.0 b/LICENSES/deprecated/GPL-1.0
>> index 3a4fa969e4c29..8d0a75431f06d 100644
>> --- a/LICENSES/deprecated/GPL-1.0
>> +++ b/LICENSES/deprecated/GPL-1.0
>> @@ -14,7 +14,8 @@ License-Text:
>> Version 1, February 1989
>>
>> Copyright (C) 1989 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>> - 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
>> + <https://fsf.org/>
>> +
>
> Nit, this change, differs from this one:
>
>> --- a/LICENSES/preferred/GPL-2.0
>> +++ b/LICENSES/preferred/GPL-2.0
>> @@ -20,8 +20,8 @@ License-Text:
>> GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
>> Version 2, June 1991
>>
>> - Copyright (C) 1989, 1991 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>> - 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
>> + Copyright (C) 1989, 1991 Free Software Foundation, Inc.,
>> + <https://fsf.org/>
>> Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies
>> of this license document, but changing it is not allowed.
>>
>
> Ah, wait, that's what the FSF did on their site, ugh.
>
> How about make this 4 patches, one for each file, include a link to
> where each of the changes came from (you only have one link in the
> changelog.)
>
> Just to be explicit here.
Ok, can do.
Thomas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists