linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] remoteproc: imx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aHkNS51jgV5ulsNB@p14s>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2025 08:48:43 -0600
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
To: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
Cc: "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@...nel.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	Frank Li <frank.li@....com>, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
	"imx@...ts.linux.dev" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
	Iuliana Prodan <iuliana.prodan@....com>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	"linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
	Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] remoteproc: imx_rproc: Support i.MX95

On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 11:52:05AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] remoteproc: imx_rproc: Support i.MX95
> > 
> [...] 
> > New warnings running 'make CHECK_DTBS=y for
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/' for 20250710-imx95-rproc-1-v4-0-
> > a7123e857dfb@....com:
> > 
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95-tqma9596sa-mb-smarc-2.dtb:
> > scmi (arm,scmi): Unevaluated properties are not allowed
> > ('protocol@80', 'protocol@81', 'protocol@82', 'protocol@84' were
> > unexpected)
> 
> Same as replied in v3.
> This is because [1] is still not picked, not because of my patchset.

I won't move on this patchset until this is resolved.

> 
> [1]https://lore.kernel.org/imx/20250513-whimsical-almond-quoll-e3ad5b@sudeepholla/
> 
> Thanks,
> Peng.