[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAN+4W8i+PqYDcJjWk+g63W4kdKvhFKSad61q-T=JJky5m7j79w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2025 16:15:07 +0100
From: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...valent.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@...com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 1/3] btf: allow mmap of vmlinux btf
On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 3:49 PM Alexei Starovoitov
<alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> wrote:
> __pa_symbol() should work for start_BTF, but would be good
> to double check with Ard that the rest stays linear.
Alexei,
This code in the arm64 setup does make me think we'll be OK.
kernel_code.start = __pa_symbol(_stext);
kernel_code.end = __pa_symbol(__init_begin - 1);
kernel_data.start = __pa_symbol(_sdata);
kernel_data.end = __pa_symbol(_end - 1);
Using these as start and end only makes sense to me if the addresses
are linear? See
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.15.6/source/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c#L217
Let me know if you want me to double check with Ard regardless.
Best
Lorenz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists