lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFBinCDyjf7MOE6f_AGEEwqV8z68qRv6JAUxn7zt5ZZqwFLkPg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2025 17:43:51 +0200
From: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
To: chuan.liu@...ogic.com
Cc: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>, 
	Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
	linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: amlogic: clk-measure: Optimize measurement accuracy

Hello,

thank you for this patch!

On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 5:08 AM Chuan Liu via B4 Relay
<devnull+chuan.liu.amlogic.com@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> From: Chuan Liu <chuan.liu@...ogic.com>
>
> The cycle count register has a 20-bit effective width, but the driver
> only utilizes 16 bits. This reduces the sampling window when measuring
> high-frequency clocks, resulting in (slightly) degraded measurement
> accuracy.
I checked the Meson8 downstream code [0] and it uses 0x000FFFFF to
mask the register value -> this means that old SoCs also have a 20-bit
wide width.

[...]
> Here are the test comparisons based on C3:
[...]
> Here are the test comparisons based on C3:
I have tested this patch with Meson8b based Odroid-C1:
pre-optimization:
# time cat /sys/kernel/debug/meson-clk-msr/measure_summary | grep -v "  0  "
  clock                     rate    precision
---------------------------------------------
 clk81                 159372396    +/-5208Hz
 a9_clk_div16           24000000    +/-3125Hz
 rtc_osc_clk_out           31250    +/-3125Hz
 hdmi_ch0_tmds         146399038    +/-4807Hz
 sar_adc                 1140625    +/-3125Hz
 sdhc_rx                94443750    +/-3125Hz
 sdhc_sd                94443750    +/-3125Hz
 pwm_d                 849921875    +/-31250Hz
 pwm_c                 849921875    +/-31250Hz

real    0m0.102s
user    0m0.005s
sys     0m0.069s


post-optimization:
# time cat /sys/kernel/debug/meson-clk-msr/measure_summary | grep -v "  0  "
  clock                     rate    precision
---------------------------------------------
 clk81                 159373438    +/-1562Hz
 a9_clk_div16           12000000    +/-1562Hz
 rtc_osc_clk_out           32813    +/-1562Hz
 hdmi_ch0_tmds         146398438    +/-1562Hz
 sar_adc                 1143750    +/-1562Hz
 sdhc_rx                94443750    +/-1562Hz
 sdhc_sd                94443750    +/-1562Hz
 pwm_d                 849992188    +/-1562Hz
 pwm_c                 849992188    +/-1562Hz

real    0m0.173s
user    0m0.008s
sys     0m0.109s

So there's also an improvement in accuracy. The only downside I'm
seeing is that it takes 75% extra time for the measurement. For me
this is irrelevant since we use this for debugging.

[...]
> +       /*
> +        * HACK: The input clock signal path from gate (Controlled by MSR_RUN)
> +        * to internal sampling circuit in clk-measure has a propagation delay
> +        * requirement: 24 clock cycles must elapse after mux selection before
> +        * sampling.
> +        *
> +        * For a 30kHz measurement clock, this translates to an 800μs delay:
> +        * 800us = 24 / 30000Hz.
> +        */
> +       fsleep(800);
What is needed to make this not a HACK anymore? Is there a register
that we can poll for the number of clock cycles that have passed?


Best regards,
Martin

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ