[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250717121010.4246366a@batman.local.home>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2025 12:10:10 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, Mathieu Desnoyers
<mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Jiri
Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Thomas
Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Indu
Bhagat <indu.bhagat@...cle.com>, "Jose E. Marchesi" <jemarch@....org>, Beau
Belgrave <beaub@...ux.microsoft.com>, Jens Remus <jremus@...ux.ibm.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Andrew Morton
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Florian Weimer
<fweimer@...hat.com>, Sam James <sam@...too.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 09/12] unwind deferred: Use SRCU
unwind_deferred_task_work()
On Thu, 17 Jul 2025 08:48:40 -0700
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org> wrote:
> So if there is some reason that you absolutely cannot immediately convert
> to SRCU-fast, let's please discuss.
There's two reasons I wouldn't add it immediately.
One, is the guard(srcu_fast) isn't in mainline yet. I would either need
to open code it, or play the tricks of basing code off your tree.
Two, I'm still grasping at the concept of srcu_fast (and srcu_lite for
that matter), where I rather be slow and safe than optimize and be
unsafe. The code where this is used may be faulting in user space
memory, so it doesn't need the micro-optimizations now.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists