linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 1/5] phy: samsung-ufs: update calibration settings for EVT2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1e9001dbf6cb$6c210960$44631c20$@samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2025 09:02:26 +0530
From: "Alim Akhtar" <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>
To: "'Sowon Na'" <sowon.na@...sung.com>, <robh@...nel.org>,
	<krzk@...nel.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>, <vkoul@...nel.org>,
	<kishon@...nel.org>
Cc: <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/5] phy: samsung-ufs: update calibration settings for
 EVT2

Hi Sowon, 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sowon Na <sowon.na@...sung.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 2, 2025 7:03 AM
> To: robh@...nel.org; krzk@...nel.org; conor+dt@...nel.org;
> vkoul@...nel.org; alim.akhtar@...sung.com; kishon@...nel.org
> Cc: krzk+dt@...nel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> devicetree@...r.kernel.org; linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org;
> sowon.na@...sung.com
> Subject: [PATCH 1/5] phy: samsung-ufs: update calibration settings for EVT2
> 
> The hardware EVT version for exynosautov920 has been updated, with EVT2
> confirmed as the final production version. Accordingly, this patch updates the
> UFS PHY calibration settings to match EVT2 hardware characteristics.
> 
This patch does more then what is mentioned here, 
please update the commit with all the changes so that we understand why the changes was done. 
.
.
.[snip]
> -#define EXYNOSAUTOV920_CDR_LOCK_OFFSET
> 	0xce4
> -
> +#define EXYNOSAUTOV920_CAL_DONE_OFFSET
> 	0xce0
Any reason for not using CRD lock and using Cal Done?