lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACGkMEvX==TSK=0gH5WaFecMY1E+o7mbQ6EqJF+iaBx6DyMiJg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2025 14:01:06 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, eperezma@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org, 
	virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jonah.palmer@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V2 0/3] in order support for vhost-net

On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 1:55 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 10:03:00AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 8:04 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 14 Jul 2025 16:47:52 +0800 Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > This series implements VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER support for vhost-net. This
> > > > feature is designed to improve the performance of the virtio ring by
> > > > optimizing descriptor processing.
> > > >
> > > > Benchmarks show a notable improvement. Please see patch 3 for details.
> > >
> > > You tagged these as net-next but just to be clear -- these don't apply
> > > for us in the current form.
> > >
> >
> > Will rebase and send a new version.
> >
> > Thanks
>
> Indeed these look as if they are for my tree (so I put them in
> linux-next, without noticing the tag).

I think that's also fine.

Do you prefer all vhost/vhost-net patches to go via your tree in the future?

(Note that the reason for the conflict is because net-next gets UDP
GSO feature merged).

>
> But I also guess guest bits should be merged in the same cycle
> as host bits, less confusion.

Work for me, I will post guest bits.

Thanks

>
> --
> MST
>


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ