linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: arm: qcom-soc: Document new Milos and Glymur SoCs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <DBE4FRROKPLE.2O2PPHRU80073@fairphone.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2025 08:37:32 +0200
From: "Luca Weiss" <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>
To: "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>, "Bjorn
 Andersson" <andersson@...nel.org>, "Konrad Dybcio"
 <konradybcio@...nel.org>, "Rob Herring" <robh@...nel.org>, "Krzysztof
 Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, "Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: arm: qcom-soc: Document new Milos and
 Glymur SoCs

On Thu Jul 17, 2025 at 8:33 AM CEST, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 17/07/2025 08:27, Luca Weiss wrote:
>> On Wed Jul 16, 2025 at 6:24 PM CEST, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> Extend the schema enforcing correct SoC-block naming to cover Milos
>>> (compatibles already accepted by some maintainers for next release) and
>>> Glymur (posted on mailing lists [1]) SoCs.
>>>
>>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20250716152017.4070029-1-pankaj.patil@oss.qualcomm.com/ [1]
>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> I asked for documenting the Milos name at v2 of Milos patchset... it did
>>> not happen and patches are already being accepted.
>> 
>> Sorry about that, I seem to have missed that.
>> 
>> However I did not see any dt validation errors with my milos dts or
>> dt_binding_check on the bindings, where are these patterns relevant, in
>> case I should touch it again in the future?
>
> There would not be any errors, because how these bindings are written -
> to ignore other, unknown names.

Ok clear, thanks for sending this patch!

Regards
Luca