linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 4/9] fs/dax: use vmf_insert_folio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <x32buctb6cdgr7kfwd54blmcqs6d3ixpsujx2qlde2cf6ziayu@mrltytvzg54p>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2025 18:38:35 +1000
From: Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, 
	xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev, 
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, 
	Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>, Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@...m.com>, 
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, 
	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, 
	Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>, "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>, 
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>, 
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>, 
	Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>, Nico Pache <npache@...hat.com>, 
	Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>, Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>, Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>, 
	Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@...e.de>, 
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>, 
	Lance Yang <lance.yang@...ux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/9] fs/dax: use vmf_insert_folio_pmd() to insert the
 huge zero folio

On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 03:23:45PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Let's convert to vmf_insert_folio_pmd().
> 
> There is a theoretical change in behavior: in the unlikely case there is
> already something mapped, we'll now still call trace_dax_pmd_load_hole()
> and return VM_FAULT_NOPAGE.
> 
> Previously, we would have returned VM_FAULT_FALLBACK, and the caller
> would have zapped the PMD to try a PTE fault.
> 
> However, that behavior was different to other PTE+PMD faults, when there
> would already be something mapped, and it's not even clear if it could
> be triggered.
> 
> Assuming the huge zero folio is already mapped, all good, no need to
> fallback to PTEs.
> 
> Assuming there is already a leaf page table ... the behavior would be
> just like when trying to insert a PMD mapping a folio through
> dax_fault_iter()->vmf_insert_folio_pmd().
> 
> Assuming there is already something else mapped as PMD? It sounds like
> a BUG, and the behavior would be just like when trying to insert a PMD
> mapping a folio through dax_fault_iter()->vmf_insert_folio_pmd().
> 
> So, it sounds reasonable to not handle huge zero folios differently
> to inserting PMDs mapping folios when there already is something mapped.

Yeah, this all sounds reasonable and I was never able to hit this path with the
RFC version of this series anyway. So I suspect it really is impossible to hit
and therefore any change is theoretical.

Reviewed-by: Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>

> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
> ---
>  fs/dax.c | 47 ++++++++++-------------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/dax.c b/fs/dax.c
> index 4229513806bea..ae90706674a3f 100644
> --- a/fs/dax.c
> +++ b/fs/dax.c
> @@ -1375,51 +1375,24 @@ static vm_fault_t dax_pmd_load_hole(struct xa_state *xas, struct vm_fault *vmf,
>  		const struct iomap_iter *iter, void **entry)
>  {
>  	struct address_space *mapping = vmf->vma->vm_file->f_mapping;
> -	unsigned long pmd_addr = vmf->address & PMD_MASK;
> -	struct vm_area_struct *vma = vmf->vma;
>  	struct inode *inode = mapping->host;
> -	pgtable_t pgtable = NULL;
>  	struct folio *zero_folio;
> -	spinlock_t *ptl;
> -	pmd_t pmd_entry;
> -	unsigned long pfn;
> +	vm_fault_t ret;
>  
>  	zero_folio = mm_get_huge_zero_folio(vmf->vma->vm_mm);
>  
> -	if (unlikely(!zero_folio))
> -		goto fallback;
> -
> -	pfn = page_to_pfn(&zero_folio->page);
> -	*entry = dax_insert_entry(xas, vmf, iter, *entry, pfn,
> -				  DAX_PMD | DAX_ZERO_PAGE);
> -
> -	if (arch_needs_pgtable_deposit()) {
> -		pgtable = pte_alloc_one(vma->vm_mm);
> -		if (!pgtable)
> -			return VM_FAULT_OOM;
> -	}
> -
> -	ptl = pmd_lock(vmf->vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd);
> -	if (!pmd_none(*(vmf->pmd))) {
> -		spin_unlock(ptl);
> -		goto fallback;
> +	if (unlikely(!zero_folio)) {
> +		trace_dax_pmd_load_hole_fallback(inode, vmf, zero_folio, *entry);
> +		return VM_FAULT_FALLBACK;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (pgtable) {
> -		pgtable_trans_huge_deposit(vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd, pgtable);
> -		mm_inc_nr_ptes(vma->vm_mm);
> -	}
> -	pmd_entry = folio_mk_pmd(zero_folio, vmf->vma->vm_page_prot);
> -	set_pmd_at(vmf->vma->vm_mm, pmd_addr, vmf->pmd, pmd_entry);
> -	spin_unlock(ptl);
> -	trace_dax_pmd_load_hole(inode, vmf, zero_folio, *entry);
> -	return VM_FAULT_NOPAGE;
> +	*entry = dax_insert_entry(xas, vmf, iter, *entry, folio_pfn(zero_folio),
> +				  DAX_PMD | DAX_ZERO_PAGE);
>  
> -fallback:
> -	if (pgtable)
> -		pte_free(vma->vm_mm, pgtable);
> -	trace_dax_pmd_load_hole_fallback(inode, vmf, zero_folio, *entry);
> -	return VM_FAULT_FALLBACK;
> +	ret = vmf_insert_folio_pmd(vmf, zero_folio, false);
> +	if (ret == VM_FAULT_NOPAGE)
> +		trace_dax_pmd_load_hole(inode, vmf, zero_folio, *entry);
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  #else
>  static vm_fault_t dax_pmd_load_hole(struct xa_state *xas, struct vm_fault *vmf,
> -- 
> 2.50.1
> 
>