[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250717-kunit-kselftests-v5-8-442b711cde2e@linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2025 10:48:10 +0200
From: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de>
To: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>,
Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@...ux.dev>,
David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>, Rae Moar <rmoar@...gle.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Nicolas Schier <nicolas.schier@...ux.dev>, Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, workflows@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de>,
Nicolas Schier <nicolas.schier@...ux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH v5 08/15] kunit: tool: Don't overwrite test status based on
subtest counts
If a subtest itself reports success, but the outer testcase fails,
the whole testcase should be reported as a failure.
However the status is recalculated based on the test counts,
overwriting the outer test result.
Synthesize a failed test in this case to make sure the failure is not
swallowed.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
---
tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py | 3 +++
tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py | 1 +
tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_is_test_passed-failure-nested.log | 3 +++
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py
index c176487356e6c94882046b19ea696d750905b8d5..a7a61e627e348db14b953080ec8789994fba955a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py
+++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py
@@ -687,6 +687,9 @@ def bubble_up_test_results(test: Test) -> None:
elif test.counts.get_status() == TestStatus.TEST_CRASHED:
test.status = TestStatus.TEST_CRASHED
+ if status == TestStatus.FAILURE and test.counts.get_status() == TestStatus.SUCCESS:
+ counts.add_status(status)
+
def parse_test(lines: LineStream, expected_num: int, log: List[str], is_subtest: bool, printer: Printer) -> Test:
"""
Finds next test to parse in LineStream, creates new Test object,
diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
index b74dc05fc2fe5b3ff629172fc7aafeb5c3d29fb3..d5bbcb95ab6abb1a8ee91439d87daaf29d159294 100755
--- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
+++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
@@ -172,6 +172,7 @@ class KUnitParserTest(unittest.TestCase):
self.assertEqual(kunit_parser.TestStatus.FAILURE, result.status)
self.assertEqual(result.counts.failed, 2)
self.assertEqual(kunit_parser.TestStatus.FAILURE, result.subtests[0].status)
+ self.assertEqual(kunit_parser.TestStatus.SUCCESS, result.subtests[0].subtests[0].status)
self.assertEqual(kunit_parser.TestStatus.FAILURE, result.subtests[1].status)
self.assertEqual(kunit_parser.TestStatus.FAILURE, result.subtests[1].subtests[0].status)
diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_is_test_passed-failure-nested.log b/tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_is_test_passed-failure-nested.log
index 2e528da39ab5b2be0fca6cf9160c10929fba3c9e..5498dfd0b0db24663e1a1e9bf78c587de6746522 100644
--- a/tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_is_test_passed-failure-nested.log
+++ b/tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_is_test_passed-failure-nested.log
@@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
KTAP version 1
1..2
+ KTAP version 1
+ 1..1
+ ok 1 test 1
not ok 1 subtest 1
KTAP version 1
1..1
--
2.50.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists