[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <325c6297-b47f-43ad-8d2f-276cf70f3d57@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2025 10:23:25 +0100
From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
To: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>, Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com>,
"Lobakin, Aleksander" <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>
Cc: willy@...radead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, kernel_team@...ynix.com,
ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org, harry.yoo@...cle.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, toke@...hat.com,
david@...hat.com, Liam.Howlett@...cle.com, vbabka@...e.cz, rppt@...nel.org,
surenb@...gle.com, mhocko@...e.com, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, vishal.moola@...il.com, hannes@...xchg.org,
ziy@...dia.com, jackmanb@...gle.com, wei.fang@....com, shenwei.wang@....com,
xiaoning.wang@....com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com,
przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com, sgoutham@...vell.com, gakula@...vell.com,
sbhatta@...vell.com, hkelam@...vell.com, bbhushan2@...vell.com,
tariqt@...dia.com, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, hawk@...nel.org,
john.fastabend@...il.com, sdf@...ichev.me, saeedm@...dia.com,
leon@...nel.org, mbloch@...dia.com, danishanwar@...com, rogerq@...nel.org,
nbd@....name, lorenzo@...nel.org, ryder.lee@...iatek.com,
shayne.chen@...iatek.com, sean.wang@...iatek.com, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com, horms@...nel.org, m-malladi@...com,
krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org, matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com,
robh@...nel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v10 02/12] netmem: use netmem_desc instead of
page to access ->pp in __netmem_get_pp()
On 7/17/25 10:17, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> On 7/16/25 20:41, Mina Almasry wrote:
> ...>> I will kill __netmem_get_pp() as you and I prefer. However,
>>> __netmem_get_pp() users e.i. libeth_xdp_return_va() and
>>> libeth_xdp_tx_fill_buf() should be altered. I will modify the code like:
>>>
>>> as is: __netmem_get_pp(netmem)
>>> to be: __netmem_nmdesc(netmem)->pp
>>>
>>> Is it okay with you?
>>>
>>
>> When Pavel and I were saying 'remove __netmem_get_pp', I think we
>> meant to remove the entire concept of unsafe netmem -> page
>> conversions. I think we both don't like them. From this perspective,
>> __netmem_nmdesc(netmem)->pp is just as bad as __netmem_get_pp(netmem).
>
> Yes. It'd great to have all of them gone. IMHO it's much better
> to let the caller do the casting so at least it's explicit and
> assumptions are not hidden. E.g. instead of
>
> pp = __netmem_nmdesc(netmem)->pp;
>
> It'd be
>
> struct page *page = __netmem_to_page(netmem);
>
> page_to_nmdesc(page)->pp;
> // or page_get_pp(page), or whatever the helper is
>
> That might be easier as well.
FWIW, no need to respin a v12 for that
--
Pavel Begunkov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists