[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8728de80-f154-46fa-a8a6-da40cb5fdc65@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2025 15:06:58 +0530
From: Devarsh Thakkar <devarsht@...com>
To: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com>,
Jyri Sarha
<jyri.sarha@....fi>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Vinod Koul
<vkoul@...nel.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
Andrzej Hajda
<andrzej.hajda@...el.com>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Robert
Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>,
Laurent Pinchart
<Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
Jernej
Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Jayesh Choudhary <j-choudhary@...com>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@...nel.org>
CC: <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>,
Francesco Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it>,
Aradhya Bhatia <aradhya.bhatia@...ux.dev>,
Parth Pancholi
<parth.pancholi@...adex.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 17/17] drm/bridge: cdns-dsi: Don't fail on
MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST
Hi Tomi
Thanks for the patch.
On 18/06/25 15:29, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> While the cdns-dsi does not support DSI burst mode, the burst mode is
> essentially DSI event mode with more versatile clocking and timings.
I don't fully agree with this statement, DSI burst mode and DSI event
mode are two different things having separate requirements. DSI burst
mode maps to MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST. I don't see a separate flag for
event mode but I guess,
> Thus cdns-dsi doesn't need to fail if the DSI peripheral driver requests
> MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST.
MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST is currently not supported by the cadence DSI
host driver, so only if DSI peripheral driver is saying that burst mode
is the only one it supports in that case only we should fail.
>
> In my particular use case, this allows the use of ti-sn65dsi83 driver.
>
> Tested-by: Parth Pancholi <parth.pancholi@...adex.com>
> Tested-by: Jayesh Choudhary <j-choudhary@...com>
> Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/cadence/cdns-dsi-core.c | 4 ----
> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/cadence/cdns-dsi-core.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/cadence/cdns-dsi-core.c
> index 114d883c65dc..09b289f0fcbf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/cadence/cdns-dsi-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/cadence/cdns-dsi-core.c
> @@ -1052,10 +1052,6 @@ static int cdns_dsi_attach(struct mipi_dsi_host *host,
> if (output->dev)
> return -EBUSY;
>
> - /* We do not support burst mode yet. */
> - if (dev->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST)
> - return -ENOTSUPP;
> -
Removing this check also gives a false impression that burst mode is
supported by the driver and can also lead to failures too in case device
is only supporting burst mode.
I think it makes sense to fail only if burst mode is the only one being
supported by the device, something like below should work I believe,
if (dev->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST ==
MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST)
return -ENOTSUPP;
Regards
Devarsh
> /*
> * The host <-> device link might be described using an OF-graph
> * representation, in this case we extract the device of_node from
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists