linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 7/7] clk: qcom: gcc: Add support for Global Clock Controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <40534488-24f6-4958-b032-d45a177dfd80@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2025 12:08:11 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>,
 Pankaj Patil <pankaj.patil@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: sboyd@...nel.org, mturquette@...libre.com, andersson@...nel.org,
 robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
 quic_rjendra@...cinc.com, taniya.das@....qualcomm.com,
 linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] clk: qcom: gcc: Add support for Global Clock
 Controller

On 17/07/2025 11:57, Abel Vesa wrote:
> On 25-07-16 20:50:17, Pankaj Patil wrote:
>> From: Taniya Das <taniya.das@....qualcomm.com>
>>
>> Add support for Global clock controller for Glymur platform.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <taniya.das@....qualcomm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Patil <pankaj.patil@....qualcomm.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/clk/qcom/Kconfig      |   10 +
>>  drivers/clk/qcom/Makefile     |    1 +
>>  drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-glymur.c | 8623 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  3 files changed, 8634 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644 drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-glymur.c
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/Kconfig b/drivers/clk/qcom/Kconfig
>> index 051301007aa6..1d9e8c6aeaed 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/Kconfig
>> @@ -645,6 +645,16 @@ config SAR_GPUCC_2130P
>>  	  Say Y if you want to support graphics controller devices and
>>  	  functionality such as 3D graphics.
>>  
>> +config SC_GCC_GLYMUR
> 
> Wait, are we going back to this now?
> 
> X Elite had CLK_X1E80100_GCC, so maybe this should be CLK_GLYMUR_GCC
> then.


Yeah, the SC is meaningless here, unless you call it CLK_SC8480XP_GCC,
so the authors need to decide on one naming. Not mixtures..


Best regards,
Krzysztof