[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGtprH_fNofCjJH1hWKoPwd-wT7QmyXvS7d9xpRNYxBznNUY+w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2025 05:25:42 -0700
From: Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@...gle.com>
To: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: TDX: Don't report base TDVMCALLs
On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 7:28 PM Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com> wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
> index f31ccdeb905b..ea1261ca805f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
> @@ -173,7 +173,6 @@ static void td_init_cpuid_entry2(struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entry, unsigned char i
> tdx_clear_unsupported_cpuid(entry);
> }
>
> -#define TDVMCALLINFO_GET_QUOTE BIT(0)
> #define TDVMCALLINFO_SETUP_EVENT_NOTIFY_INTERRUPT BIT(1)
I am struggling to find the patch that adds support for
TDVMCALLINFO_SETUP_EVENT_NOTIFY_INTERRUPT. Can you help point out the
series that adds this support?
Thanks,
Vishal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists