[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+db+r76Sxw13Wsz9rCDEwCCB9DdpQqOvQ9a6qOxzmSKLfgrkA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2025 18:24:15 +0530
From: Darshan Rathod <darshanrathod475@...il.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>, Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, linux-aio@...ck.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/aio: Use unsigned int instead of plain unsigned
Hi Matthew,
You're right, I made an incorrect assumption about a general coding
style rule. Thanks for the clarification and for sharing your
preference.
Apologies for the noise. I'll consider this patch withdrawn.
Best,
Darshan
On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 5:58 PM Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 11:51:37AM +0000, Darshan Rathod wrote:
> All instances of the shorthand type `unsigned` have been replaced with the more explicit `unsigned int`.
> >
> > While functionally identical, this change improves code clarity and brings it into alignment with the preferred Linux kernel coding style.
>
> says who? i prefer plain 'unsigned'
Powered by blists - more mailing lists