lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250717132633.1339965-1-chao@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2025 21:26:33 +0800
From: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
To: jaegeuk@...nel.org
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>,
	stable@...nel.org,
	Jiaming Zhang <r772577952@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: fix to avoid out-of-boundary access in dnode page

As Jiaming Zhang reported:

 <TASK>
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]
 dump_stack_lvl+0x1c1/0x2a0 lib/dump_stack.c:120
 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:378 [inline]
 print_report+0x17e/0x800 mm/kasan/report.c:480
 kasan_report+0x147/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:593
 data_blkaddr fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:3053 [inline]
 f2fs_data_blkaddr fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:3058 [inline]
 f2fs_get_dnode_of_data+0x1a09/0x1c40 fs/f2fs/node.c:855
 f2fs_reserve_block+0x53/0x310 fs/f2fs/data.c:1195
 prepare_write_begin fs/f2fs/data.c:3395 [inline]
 f2fs_write_begin+0xf39/0x2190 fs/f2fs/data.c:3594
 generic_perform_write+0x2c7/0x910 mm/filemap.c:4112
 f2fs_buffered_write_iter fs/f2fs/file.c:4988 [inline]
 f2fs_file_write_iter+0x1ec8/0x2410 fs/f2fs/file.c:5216
 new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:593 [inline]
 vfs_write+0x546/0xa90 fs/read_write.c:686
 ksys_write+0x149/0x250 fs/read_write.c:738
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x3d0 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

The root cause is in the corrupted image, there is a dnode has the same
node id w/ its inode, so during f2fs_get_dnode_of_data(), it tries to
access block address in dnode at offset 934, however it parses the dnode
as inode node, so that get_dnode_addr() returns 360, then it tries to
access page address from 360 + 934 * 4 = 4096 w/ 4 bytes.

To fix this issue, let's add sanity check for node id of all direct nodes
during f2fs_get_dnode_of_data().

Cc: stable@...nel.org
Reported-by: Jiaming Zhang <r772577952@...il.com>
Closes: https://groups.google.com/g/syzkaller/c/-ZnaaOOfO3M
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
---
 fs/f2fs/node.c | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
index 651537598759..12cab5c69fcd 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
@@ -815,6 +815,16 @@ int f2fs_get_dnode_of_data(struct dnode_of_data *dn, pgoff_t index, int mode)
 	for (i = 1; i <= level; i++) {
 		bool done = false;
 
+		if (nids[i] && nids[i] == dn->inode->i_ino) {
+			err = -EFSCORRUPTED;
+			f2fs_err_ratelimited(sbi,
+				"inode mapping table is corrupted, run fsck to fix it, "
+				"ino:%lu, nid:%u, level:%d, offset:%d",
+				dn->inode->i_ino, nids[i], level, offset[level]);
+			set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_NEED_FSCK);
+			goto release_pages;
+		}
+
 		if (!nids[i] && mode == ALLOC_NODE) {
 			/* alloc new node */
 			if (!f2fs_alloc_nid(sbi, &(nids[i]))) {
-- 
2.49.0


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ