[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aHppzp0WIbLZfVqu@google.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2025 08:35:42 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>
Cc: pbonzini@...hat.com, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com, kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com,
kai.huang@...el.com, reinette.chatre@...el.com, tony.lindgren@...ux.intel.com,
binbin.wu@...ux.intel.com, isaku.yamahata@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yan.y.zhao@...el.com, chao.gao@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 0/1] KVM: TDX: Decrease TDX VM shutdown time
On Wed, Jul 16, 2025, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
> On 7/11/2025 10:19 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 11, 2025, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
> ...
> > >
> > > I'm wondering if we need a TDX centralized enumeration interface, e.g., new
> > > field in struct kvm_tdx_capabilities. I believe there will be more and more
> > > TDX new features, and assigning each a KVM_CAP seems wasteful.
> >
> > Oh, yeah, that's a much better idea. In addition to not polluting KVM_CAP,
> >
> > LOL, and we certainly have the capacity in the structure:
> >
> > __u64 reserved[250];
> >
> > Sans documentation, something like so?
>
> I suppose it will be squashed into the original patch,
I dropped the commit from kvm-x86/vmx, and will send a full v5. There's enough
moving parts that I don't want to risk going 'round in circles trying to squash
fixes :-)
> so just gave
>
> Tested-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists