[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=Vrp9MM_5de10sV-TC_mp-D7en9gjU8DBoD6mBrRvF2eg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2025 09:11:20 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Brigham Campbell <me@...ghamcampbell.com>
Cc: tejasvipin76@...il.com, diogo.ivo@...nico.ulisboa.pt,
skhan@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linux.dev,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Jessica Zhang <jessica.zhang@....qualcomm.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] drm/panel: jdi-lpm102a188a: Fix bug and clean up driver
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 9:41 AM Brigham Campbell <me@...ghamcampbell.com> wrote:
>
> static int jdi_panel_prepare(struct drm_panel *panel)
> {
> struct jdi_panel *jdi = to_panel_jdi(panel);
> + struct mipi_dsi_multi_context dsi_ctx = { .accum_err = 0 };
nit: can just be this:
struct mipi_dsi_multi_context dsi_ctx = {};
This looks so nice and clean now! :-) I'd bet that the compiled size
of the code is also quite a bit smaller as well...
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists