[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <eaab7061-a02c-43fd-9a02-6ff9625401a8@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2025 19:21:27 +0200
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] dt-bindings: power: qcom-rpmpd: split RPMh domains
definitions
On 7/18/25 6:13 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> Historically both RPM and RPMh domain definitions were a part of the
> same, qcom-rpmpd.h header. Now as we have a separate header for RPMh
> definitions, qcom,rpmhpd.h, move all RPMh power domain definitions to
> that header.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
> ---
[...]
> -/* SC8280XP Power Domain Indexes */
> -#define SC8280XP_CX 0
> -#define SC8280XP_CX_AO 1
> -#define SC8280XP_DDR 2
> -#define SC8280XP_EBI 3
> -#define SC8280XP_GFX 4
> -#define SC8280XP_LCX 5
> -#define SC8280XP_LMX 6
> -#define SC8280XP_MMCX 7
> -#define SC8280XP_MMCX_AO 8
> -#define SC8280XP_MSS 9
> -#define SC8280XP_MX 10
> -#define SC8280XP_MXC 12
> -#define SC8280XP_MX_AO 11
> -#define SC8280XP_NSP 13
> -#define SC8280XP_QPHY 14
> -#define SC8280XP_XO 15
> -
> -/* SDM845 Power Domain performance levels */
I was never a fan of these comments but whatever, it's an include
if the dt folks don't object, this is good
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists