[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <effb9b2a-73da-4e0f-8672-b9d3f800b8b4@web.de>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2025 20:30:35 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Himanshu Mittal <h-mittal1@...com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, MD Danish Anwar <danishanwar@...com>,
Meghana Malladi <m-malladi@...com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
prajith@...com, Pratheesh Gangadhar <pratheesh@...com>,
Sriramakrishnan <srk@...com>, Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>
Subject: Re: [v3] net: ti: icssg-prueth: Fix buffer allocation for ICSSG
>> Can the usage of the conditional operator be extended another bit
>> (also for the function “prueth_emac_buffer_setup” for example)?
>
> 1. (Subjective) The current code seems fine to me
Under which circumstances would you get into the mood to avoid
duplicate source code further?
> 2. (Objective) Your suggestion features unnecessary parentheses, and
> incorrect indentation and whitespace
Which code formatting would you find more reasonable then instead?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists