linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] io_uring/btrfs: remove struct io_uring_cmd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <72eeb282-2e9a-4c06-ac5c-54f226a8500d@kernel.dk>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2025 12:36:07 -0600
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: dsterba@...e.cz
Cc: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@...estorage.com>, Chris Mason <clm@...com>,
 Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>, David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
 Mark Harmstone <maharmstone@...com>, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
 io-uring@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] io_uring/btrfs: remove struct io_uring_cmd_data

On 7/18/25 11:26 AM, David Sterba wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 10:58:07AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 7/17/25 2:04 PM, Caleb Sander Mateos wrote:
>>> Hi Jens,
>>> Are you satisfied with the updated version of this series? Let me know
>>> if there's anything else you'd like to see.
>>
>> I'm fine with it, was hoping some of the CC'ed btrfs folks would ack or
>> review the btrfs bits. OOO until late sunday, if I hear nothing else by
>> then, I'll just tentatively stage it in a separate branch for 6.17.
> 
> I've taken the first patch to btrfs' for-next but if you want to add it
> to your queue then git will deal with that too. For the btrfs changes
> 
> Acked-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>

Thanks! I guess that works fine, it can go in separately. I've queued
up the rest.

-- 
Jens Axboe