linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/hyperv: Switch to msi_create_parent_irq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87cy9xwc3d.ffs@tglx>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2025 21:08:54 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Nuno Das Neves <nunodasneves@...ux.microsoft.com>, Wei Liu
 <wei.liu@...nel.org>, Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>
Cc: "K . Y . Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
 Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>, Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
 Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Dave
 Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org, "H . Peter Anvin"
 <hpa@...or.com>, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/hyperv: Switch to
 msi_create_parent_irq_domain()

On Tue, Jul 15 2025 at 12:09, Nuno Das Neves wrote:
> On 7/9/2025 4:40 PM, Wei Liu wrote:
>> CC Nuno who is also touching on this file.
>> 
>> Nam, thanks for this patch. 
>> 
>> Nuno's patches fix a few bugs with the current implementation. I expect
>> those patches to have contextual conflicts with this patch. I would like
>> to commit Nuno's patches first since those are bug fixes, and then
>> circle back to this one.
>> 
>> Nuno, can you please review this patch?
>> 
>
> I don't think I can give a Reviewed-by since I don't have the context
> for these changes.

The cover letter provides the information along with a link for deeper
information:

  https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1751277765.git.namcao@linutronix.de

> It doesn't look like this conflicts with the changes in my patches.

It might not look like it, but reality tells a different story:

Applying patch _PATCH_v2_2_2_x86_hyperv_Switch_to_msi_create_parent_irq_domain_.patch
patching file arch/x86/hyperv/irqdomain.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 10.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 276.
2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file arch/x86/hyperv/irqdomain.c
patching file drivers/hv/Kconfig
Hunk #1 FAILED at 10.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- rejects in file drivers/hv/Kconfig

Nam, can you please redo the patch against the hyperv tree?

Thanks,

        tglx