[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6fb070fc-01f3-469e-9434-775319532c59@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2025 15:45:46 -0700
From: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>
To: "Bowman, Terry" <terry.bowman@....com>, dave@...olabs.net,
jonathan.cameron@...wei.com, alison.schofield@...el.com,
dan.j.williams@...el.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com, shiju.jose@...wei.com,
ming.li@...omail.com, Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com,
rrichter@....com, dan.carpenter@...aro.org,
PradeepVineshReddy.Kodamati@....com, lukas@...ner.de,
Benjamin.Cheatham@....com, sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com,
linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 09/17] cxl/pci: Map CXL Endpoint Port and CXL Switch
Port RAS registers
On 7/18/25 3:40 PM, Bowman, Terry wrote:
> On 7/18/2025 5:01 PM, Dave Jiang wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 7/18/25 2:55 PM, Bowman, Terry wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 7/18/2025 4:28 PM, Dave Jiang wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 6/26/25 3:42 PM, Terry Bowman wrote:
>>>>> CXL Endpoint (EP) Ports may include Root Ports (RP) or Downstream Switch
>>>>> Ports (DSP). CXL RPs and DSPs contain RAS registers that require memory
>>>>> mapping to enable RAS logging. This initialization is currently missing and
>>>>> must be added for CXL RPs and DSPs.
>>>>>
>>>>> Update cxl_dport_init_ras_reporting() to support RP and DSP RAS mapping.
>>>>> Add alongside the existing Restricted CXL Host Downstream Port RAS mapping.
>>>>>
>>>>> Update cxl_endpoint_port_probe() to invoke cxl_dport_init_ras_reporting().
>>>>> This will initiate the RAS mapping for CXL RPs and DSPs when each CXL EP is
>>>>> created and added to the EP port.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@....com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/cxl/cxl.h | 2 ++
>>>>> drivers/cxl/mem.c | 3 ++-
>>>>> drivers/cxl/port.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>>> 3 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
>>>>> index c57c160f3e5e..d696d419bd5a 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
>>>>> @@ -590,6 +590,7 @@ struct cxl_dax_region {
>>>>> * @parent_dport: dport that points to this port in the parent
>>>>> * @decoder_ida: allocator for decoder ids
>>>>> * @reg_map: component and ras register mapping parameters
>>>>> + * @uport_regs: mapped component registers
>>>>> * @nr_dports: number of entries in @dports
>>>>> * @hdm_end: track last allocated HDM decoder instance for allocation ordering
>>>>> * @commit_end: cursor to track highest committed decoder for commit ordering
>>>>> @@ -610,6 +611,7 @@ struct cxl_port {
>>>>> struct cxl_dport *parent_dport;
>>>>> struct ida decoder_ida;
>>>>> struct cxl_register_map reg_map;
>>>>> + struct cxl_component_regs uport_regs;
>>>>> int nr_dports;
>>>>> int hdm_end;
>>>>> int commit_end;
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/mem.c b/drivers/cxl/mem.c
>>>>> index 6e6777b7bafb..d2155f45240d 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/cxl/mem.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/cxl/mem.c
>>>>> @@ -166,7 +166,8 @@ static int cxl_mem_probe(struct device *dev)
>>>>> else
>>>>> endpoint_parent = &parent_port->dev;
>>>>>
>>>>> - cxl_dport_init_ras_reporting(dport, dev);
>>>>> + if (dport->rch)
>>>>> + cxl_dport_init_ras_reporting(dport, dev);
>>>>>
>>>>> scoped_guard(device, endpoint_parent) {
>>>>> if (!endpoint_parent->driver) {
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/port.c b/drivers/cxl/port.c
>>>>> index 021f35145c65..b52f82925891 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/cxl/port.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/cxl/port.c
>>>>> @@ -111,6 +111,17 @@ static void cxl_disable_rch_root_ints(struct cxl_dport *dport)
>>>>> writel(aer_cmd, aer_base + PCI_ERR_ROOT_COMMAND);
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> +static void cxl_uport_init_ras_reporting(struct cxl_port *port,
>>>>> + struct device *host)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + struct cxl_register_map *map = &port->reg_map;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + map->host = host;
>>>>> + if (cxl_map_component_regs(map, &port->uport_regs,
>>>>> + BIT(CXL_CM_CAP_CAP_ID_RAS)))
>>>>> + dev_dbg(&port->dev, "Failed to map RAS capability\n");
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> /**
>>>>> * cxl_dport_init_ras_reporting - Setup CXL RAS report on this dport
>>>>> * @dport: the cxl_dport that needs to be initialized
>>>>> @@ -119,7 +130,6 @@ static void cxl_disable_rch_root_ints(struct cxl_dport *dport)
>>>>> void cxl_dport_init_ras_reporting(struct cxl_dport *dport, struct device *host)
>>>>> {
>>>>> dport->reg_map.host = host;
>>>>> - cxl_dport_map_ras(dport);
>>>>>
>>>>> if (dport->rch) {
>>>>> struct pci_host_bridge *host_bridge = to_pci_host_bridge(dport->dport_dev);
>>>>> @@ -127,12 +137,54 @@ void cxl_dport_init_ras_reporting(struct cxl_dport *dport, struct device *host)
>>>>> if (!host_bridge->native_aer)
>>>>> return;
>>>>>
>>>>> + cxl_dport_map_ras(dport);
>>>>> cxl_dport_map_rch_aer(dport);
>>>>> cxl_disable_rch_root_ints(dport);
>>>>> + return;
>>>>> }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (cxl_map_component_regs(&dport->reg_map, &dport->regs.component,
>>>>> + BIT(CXL_CM_CAP_CAP_ID_RAS)))
>>>>> + dev_dbg(dport->dport_dev, "Failed to map RAS capability\n");
>>>>> +
>>>>> }
>>>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(cxl_dport_init_ras_reporting, "CXL");
>>>>>
>>>>> +static void cxl_switch_port_init_ras(struct cxl_port *port)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + if (is_cxl_root(to_cxl_port(port->dev.parent)))
>>>>> + return;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /* May have upstream DSP or RP */
>>>>> + if (port->parent_dport && dev_is_pci(port->parent_dport->dport_dev)) {
>>>>> + struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(port->parent_dport->dport_dev);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if ((pci_pcie_type(pdev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT) ||
>>>>> + (pci_pcie_type(pdev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_DOWNSTREAM))
>>>>> + cxl_dport_init_ras_reporting(port->parent_dport, &port->dev);
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + cxl_uport_init_ras_reporting(port, &port->dev);
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +static void cxl_endpoint_port_init_ras(struct cxl_port *port)
>>>> Maybe rename 'port' to 'ep' to be explicit
>>> Ok
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + struct cxl_dport *dport;
>>>> parent_dport would be clearer. I was thinking why does the endpoint have a dport for a second there.
>>> Ok
>>>>> + struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd = to_cxl_memdev(port->uport_dev);
>>>>> + struct cxl_port *parent_port __free(put_cxl_port) =
>>>>> + cxl_mem_find_port(cxlmd, &dport);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (!dport || !dev_is_pci(dport->dport_dev)) {
>>>>> + dev_err(&port->dev, "CXL port topology not found\n");> + return;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + cxl_dport_init_ras_reporting(dport, cxlmd->cxlds->dev);
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +#else
>>>>> +static void cxl_endpoint_port_init_ras(struct cxl_port *port) { }
>>>>> +static void cxl_switch_port_init_ras(struct cxl_port *port) { }
>>>>> #endif /* CONFIG_PCIEAER_CXL */
>>>> I cc'd you on the new patch to move all the AER stuff to core/pci_aer.c. That should take care of ifdef CONFIG_PCIEAER_CXL in pci.c and port.c.
>>>>
>>>> DJ
>>>
>>> Move to core/native_ras.c introduced in "Dequeue forwarded CXL error", right? I just want to be certain.
>>
>> I just posted this [1] to clean up what's there. Do you prefer me to just rename the file to native_ras.c? Or maybe pci_ras.c?
>>
>> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/20250718212452.2100663-1-dave.jiang@intel.com/
>>
>> DJ
>>
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> I think leaving as you have it is fine.
>
> Would you like to see my v10 changes in core/native_ras.c stay as-is or move into pci_aer.c?
Yes. Let's move it all to pci_aer.c in v11 if no one objects to my changes. Thanks!
DJ
>
> -Terry
>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Terry
>>>
>>>>> > static int cxl_switch_port_probe(struct cxl_port *port)
>>>>> @@ -149,6 +201,8 @@ static int cxl_switch_port_probe(struct cxl_port *port)
>>>>>
>>>>> cxl_switch_parse_cdat(port);
>>>>>
>>>>> + cxl_switch_port_init_ras(port);
>>>>> +
>>>>> cxlhdm = devm_cxl_setup_hdm(port, NULL);
>>>>> if (!IS_ERR(cxlhdm))
>>>>> return devm_cxl_enumerate_decoders(cxlhdm, NULL);
>>>>> @@ -203,6 +257,8 @@ static int cxl_endpoint_port_probe(struct cxl_port *port)
>>>>> if (rc)
>>>>> return rc;
>>>>>
>>>>> + cxl_endpoint_port_init_ras(port);
>>>>> +
>>>>> /*
>>>>> * Now that all endpoint decoders are successfully enumerated, try to
>>>>> * assemble regions from committed decoders
>>>
>>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists