lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <26197475.6Emhk5qWAg@senjougahara>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2025 18:22:42 +0900
From: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com>
To: Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@...il.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
 Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
 David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
 Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>, Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
 Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com>,
 Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
 Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject:
 Re: [PATCH v1 5/5] ARM: tegra: add MIPI calibration binding for
 Tegra20/Tegra30

On Friday, July 18, 2025 6:15 PM Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:
> пт, 18 лип. 2025 р. о 12:01 Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com> пише:
> > On Thursday, July 17, 2025 11:21 PM Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:
> > > Add MIPI calibration device node for Tegra20 and Tegra30.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@...il.com>
> > > ---
> > > 
> > >  arch/arm/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra20.dtsi | 14 ++++++++++++++
> > >  arch/arm/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra30.dtsi | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> > >  2 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra20.dtsi
> > > b/arch/arm/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra20.dtsi index 92d422f83ea4..521261045cc8
> > > 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra20.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra20.dtsi
> > > @@ -74,6 +74,16 @@ vi@...80000 {
> > > 
> > >                       status = "disabled";
> > >               
> > >               };
> > > 
> > > +             /* DSI MIPI calibration logic is a part of VI/CSI */
> > > +             mipi: mipi@...80220 {
> > > +                     compatible = "nvidia,tegra20-mipi";
> > > +                     reg = <0x54080220 0x100>;
> > > +                     clocks = <&tegra_car TEGRA20_CLK_VI>,
> > > +                              <&tegra_car TEGRA20_CLK_CSI>;
> > > +                     clock-names = "vi", "csi";
> > > +                     #nvidia,mipi-calibrate-cells = <1>;
> > > +             };
> > > +
> > 
> > As you say in the comment, MIPI calibration on Tegra20/30 is part of
> > VI/CSI. We can't add a "mipi" device here since such a device doesn't
> > exist in the hardware hierarchy. We already have the VI device in the
> > device tree, so we need to use that.
> 
> I understand your point, but embedding MIPI calibration logic into
> VI/CSI driver will bring up another lever of unnecessary complexity
> and excessive coding. While approach I have proposed preserves
> separation between CSI and DSI and reuses already existing MIPI
> calibration framework.

We can consider different driver architectures to simplify things, but the 
device tree has to conform to hardware. The host1x bus has no 'mipi' device on 
it so we can't put one in the device tree.

> 
> > A driver for tegra20-vi already exists in
> > staging/drivers/media/tegra-video. We should aim not to break it. Perhaps
> > bring it out of staging? (At least partially, but then why not the whole
> > thing.)
> 
> It does not break VI/CSI, I have a WIP CSI implementation for
> Tegra20/Tegra30 which I hope to submit soon.

We have to use the tegra20-vi node as that matches hardware, and each node can 
only be probed to one device, hence the issue.

Great to see a CSI driver!

Mikko

> 
> > Thanks,
> > Mikko





Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ