linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v15 0/3] rust: platform: add Io support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2025071913-coach-prior-d71e@gregkh>
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2025 10:01:36 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@...labora.com>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
	Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
	Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>,
	Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
	Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
	Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
	Fiona Behrens <me@...enk.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 0/3] rust: platform: add Io support

On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 12:55:21PM -0300, Daniel Almeida wrote:
> ---
> Daniel Almeida (3):
>       rust: io: add resource abstraction
>       rust: io: mem: add a generic iomem abstraction
>       rust: platform: add resource accessors
> 
>  rust/bindings/bindings_helper.h |   1 +
>  rust/helpers/io.c               |  41 ++++++
>  rust/kernel/io.rs               |   5 +
>  rust/kernel/io/mem.rs           | 283 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  rust/kernel/io/resource.rs      | 229 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  rust/kernel/platform.rs         |  60 ++++++++-
>  6 files changed, 618 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Who is going to be responsible for the new files you have added?

And no real objection, but no copyright info was added to them either,
was that intentional?  I know some companies frown on that as it goes
against their corporate policy (but some don't care, it's hard to keep
track of who likes what at times...)

thanks,

greg k-h