lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54eaf8e8-2b4d-b0bd-b65f-1262e72a54dd@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2025 21:05:16 +0530
From: Shivendra Pratap <shivendra.pratap@....qualcomm.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        Souvik Chakravarty <Souvik.Chakravarty@....com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Andy Yan <andy.yan@...k-chips.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
        cros-qcom-dts-watchers@...omium.org, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
        Mukesh Ojha <mukesh.ojha@....qualcomm.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        Andre Draszik
 <andre.draszik@...aro.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        Elliot Berman <quic_eberman@...cinc.com>,
        Srinivas Kandagatla <srini@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 1/8] power: reset: reboot-mode: Add device tree
 node-based registration



On 7/19/2025 12:07 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 06:16:47PM +0530, Shivendra Pratap wrote:
>> The reboot-mode driver does not have a strict requirement for
>> device-based registration. It primarily uses the device's of_node
>> to read mode-<cmd> properties and the device pointer for logging.
>>
>> Remove the dependency on struct device and introduce support for
>> Device Tree (DT) node-based registration. This enables drivers
>> that are not associated with a struct device to leverage the
>> reboot-mode framework.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shivendra Pratap <shivendra.pratap@....qualcomm.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/power/reset/reboot-mode.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++----------
>>  include/linux/reboot-mode.h       |  2 +-
>>  2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/power/reset/reboot-mode.c b/drivers/power/reset/reboot-mode.c
>> index fba53f638da04655e756b5f8b7d2d666d1379535..0269ec55106472cf2f2b12bd65704dd0114bf4a3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/power/reset/reboot-mode.c
>> +++ b/drivers/power/reset/reboot-mode.c
>> @@ -3,13 +3,17 @@
>>   * Copyright (c) 2016, Fuzhou Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd
>>   */
>>  
>> +#define pr_fmt(fmt)	"reboot-mode: " fmt
>> +
>>  #include <linux/device.h>
>>  #include <linux/init.h>
>>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
>> +#include <linux/list.h>
>>  #include <linux/module.h>
>>  #include <linux/of.h>
>>  #include <linux/reboot.h>
>>  #include <linux/reboot-mode.h>
>> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>>  
>>  #define PREFIX "mode-"
>>  
>> @@ -65,33 +69,35 @@ static int reboot_mode_notify(struct notifier_block *this,
>>  /**
>>   * reboot_mode_register - register a reboot mode driver
>>   * @reboot: reboot mode driver
>> + * @np: Pointer to device tree node
>>   *
>>   * Returns: 0 on success or a negative error code on failure.
>>   */
>> -int reboot_mode_register(struct reboot_mode_driver *reboot)
>> +int reboot_mode_register(struct reboot_mode_driver *reboot, struct device_node *np)
>>  {
>>  	struct mode_info *info;
>>  	struct property *prop;
>> -	struct device_node *np = reboot->dev->of_node;
>>  	size_t len = strlen(PREFIX);
>>  	int ret;
>>  
>> +	if (!np)
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +
>>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&reboot->head);
>>  
>>  	for_each_property_of_node(np, prop) {
>>  		if (strncmp(prop->name, PREFIX, len))
>>  			continue;
>>  
>> -		info = devm_kzalloc(reboot->dev, sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +		info = kzalloc(sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL);
>>  		if (!info) {
>>  			ret = -ENOMEM;
>>  			goto error;
>>  		}
>>  
>>  		if (of_property_read_u32(np, prop->name, &info->magic)) {
>> -			dev_err(reboot->dev, "reboot mode %s without magic number\n",
>> -				info->mode);
>> -			devm_kfree(reboot->dev, info);
>> +			pr_err("reboot mode %s without magic number\n", info->mode);
>> +			kfree(info);
>>  			continue;
>>  		}
>>  
>> @@ -102,8 +108,7 @@ int reboot_mode_register(struct reboot_mode_driver *reboot)
>>  		} else if (info->mode[0] == '\0') {
>>  			kfree_const(info->mode);
>>  			ret = -EINVAL;
>> -			dev_err(reboot->dev, "invalid mode name(%s): too short!\n",
>> -				prop->name);
>> +			pr_err("invalid mode name(%s): too short!\n", prop->name);
>>  			goto error;
>>  		}
>>  
>> @@ -130,11 +135,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(reboot_mode_register);
>>  int reboot_mode_unregister(struct reboot_mode_driver *reboot)
>>  {
>>  	struct mode_info *info;
>> +	struct mode_info *next;
>>  
>>  	unregister_reboot_notifier(&reboot->reboot_notifier);
>>  
>> -	list_for_each_entry(info, &reboot->head, list)
>> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(info, next, &reboot->head, list) {
> 
> This feels liks a missing lock.
Should we add a lock here? The list will mostly be fully created only
once at the time of registration.
- thanks.
> 
>>  		kfree_const(info->mode);
>> +		list_del(&info->list);
> 
> list_del should come before kfree, otherwise it's possible to access
> freed memory while traversing the list.
sure. will make it list_del(&info->list) and then kfree_const(info->mode).
- thanks.
> 
>> +		kfree(info);
>> +	}
>>  
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>> @@ -162,7 +171,7 @@ int devm_reboot_mode_register(struct device *dev,
>>  	if (!dr)
>>  		return -ENOMEM;
>>  
>> -	rc = reboot_mode_register(reboot);
>> +	rc = reboot_mode_register(reboot, reboot->dev->of_node);
>>  	if (rc) {
>>  		devres_free(dr);
>>  		return rc;
>> diff --git a/include/linux/reboot-mode.h b/include/linux/reboot-mode.h
>> index 4a2abb38d1d612ec0fdf05eb18c98b210f631b7f..36f071f4b82e1fc255d8dd679a18e537655c3179 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/reboot-mode.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/reboot-mode.h
>> @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ struct reboot_mode_driver {
>>  	struct notifier_block reboot_notifier;
>>  };
>>  
>> -int reboot_mode_register(struct reboot_mode_driver *reboot);
>> +int reboot_mode_register(struct reboot_mode_driver *reboot, struct device_node *np);
>>  int reboot_mode_unregister(struct reboot_mode_driver *reboot);
>>  int devm_reboot_mode_register(struct device *dev,
>>  			      struct reboot_mode_driver *reboot);
>>
>> -- 
>> 2.34.1
>>
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ