linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] bcma: Use managed APIs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aHvmDZjmhxG3EJg9@pc>
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2025 19:38:05 +0100
From: Salah Triki <salah.triki@...il.com>
To: Jeff Johnson <jeff.johnson@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
	Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] bcma: Use managed APIs

On Sat, Jul 19, 2025 at 10:21:59AM -0700, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> 
> 1) When you post a new version of a patch, please do NOT have it be
> In-Reply-To any previous messages. Each version of a patch should start a
> separate e-mail thread. The guidance at
> <https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#explicit-in-reply-to-headers>
> seems outdated.
> 
> 2) Most maintainers will not accept patches which make such a big semantic
> change without actually testing the change on hardware.

Thanx for information

Best regards,
Salah Triki