lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72kvYuoSSOruDQiEo5ppSDvtxSzQ4R6rxdN9RBkucBRuew@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2025 23:09:27 +0200
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...il.com>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, 
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>, 
	Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, 
	Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, 
	Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>, 
	Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, 
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, 
	rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] rust: list: remove OFFSET constants

On Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 9:31 PM Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...il.com> wrote:
>
> -/// Declares that this type has a `ListLinks<ID>` field at a fixed offset.
> +/// Declares that this type has a [`ListLinks<ID>`] field.

I was applying this series the other day, and I noticed these
doc-related changes in the patch, which are appreciated (I think you
did it to make it consistent with the other lines you were adding with
intra-doc links), but I think in general it is better to clean those
separately in a patch first.

I am mentioning it because the docs do not build due to those --
please check the `rustdoc` target for patches, especially if it is a
non-trivial change.

I also did another change to make the examples (in the other patch)
build with the minimum Rust version. It is good to test that too,
since sometimes that can slip, especially as the window of versions
grow.

Anyway, the examples/series here caught another issue with a previous
patch, so that is good news :)

Thanks!

Cheers,
Miguel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ