[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202507200719.dWqamnJW-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2025 07:32:18 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Maxwell Bland <mbland@...orola.com>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v11 2/3] cfi: Move BPF CFI types and helpers to
generic code
Hi Sami,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on 0ee30d937c147fc14c4b49535181d437cd2fde7a]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Sami-Tolvanen/cfi-add-C-CFI-type-macro/20250719-063535
base: 0ee30d937c147fc14c4b49535181d437cd2fde7a
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250718223345.1075521-7-samitolvanen%40google.com
patch subject: [PATCH bpf-next v11 2/3] cfi: Move BPF CFI types and helpers to generic code
config: x86_64-randconfig-123-20250719 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250720/202507200719.dWqamnJW-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 20.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 87f0227cb60147a26a1eeb4fb06e3b505e9c7261)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250720/202507200719.dWqamnJW-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202507200719.dWqamnJW-lkp@intel.com/
sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> kernel/cfi.c:39:24: sparse: sparse: symbol '__bpf_prog_runX' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> kernel/cfi.c:42:28: sparse: sparse: symbol '__bpf_callback_fn' was not declared. Should it be static?
vim +/__bpf_prog_runX +39 kernel/cfi.c
31
32 /*
33 * Declare two non-existent functions with types that match bpf_func_t and
34 * bpf_callback_t pointers, and use DEFINE_CFI_TYPE to define type hash
35 * variables for each function type. The cfi_bpf_* variables are used by
36 * arch-specific BPF JIT implementations to ensure indirectly callable JIT
37 * code has matching CFI type hashes.
38 */
> 39 typeof(*(bpf_func_t)0) __bpf_prog_runX;
40 DEFINE_CFI_TYPE(cfi_bpf_hash, __bpf_prog_runX);
41
> 42 typeof(*(bpf_callback_t)0) __bpf_callback_fn;
43 DEFINE_CFI_TYPE(cfi_bpf_subprog_hash, __bpf_callback_fn);
44
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists