lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250719024403.3452285-1-wozizhi@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2025 10:44:03 +0800
From: Zizhi Wo <wozizhi@...wei.com>
To: <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, <jack@...e.com>, <brauner@...nel.org>,
	<axboe@...nel.dk>, <hch@....de>
CC: <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<wozizhi@...wei.com>, <yukuai3@...wei.com>, <yangerkun@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH] fs: Add additional checks for block devices during mount

A filesystem abnormal mount issue was found during current testing:

disk_container=$(...kata-runtime...io.kubernets.docker.type=container...)
docker_id=$(...kata-runtime...io.katacontainers.disk_share=
            "{"src":"/dev/sdb","dest":"/dev/test"}"...)
${docker} stop "$disk_container"
${docker} exec "$docker_id" mount /dev/test /tmp -->success!!

When the "disk_container" is stopped, the created sda/sdb/sdc disks are
already deleted, but inside the "docker_id", /dev/test can still be mounted
successfully. The reason is that runc calls unshare, which triggers
clone_mnt(), increasing the "sb->s_active" reference count. As long as the
"docker_id" does not exit, the superblock still has a reference count.

So when mounting, the old superblock is reused in sget_fc(), and the mount
succeeds, even if the actual device no longer exists. The whole process can
be simplified as follows:

mkfs.ext4 -F /dev/sdb
mount /dev/sdb /mnt
mknod /dev/test b 8 16    # [sdb 8:16]
echo 1 > /sys/block/sdb/device/delete
mount /dev/test /mnt1    # -> mount success

Therefore, it is necessary to add an extra check. Solve this problem by
checking disk_live() in super_s_dev_test().

Fixes: aca740cecbe5 ("fs: open block device after superblock creation")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250717091150.2156842-1-wozizhi@huawei.com/
Signed-off-by: Zizhi Wo <wozizhi@...wei.com>
---
 fs/super.c | 12 ++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/super.c b/fs/super.c
index 80418ca8e215..8030fb519eb5 100644
--- a/fs/super.c
+++ b/fs/super.c
@@ -1376,8 +1376,16 @@ static int super_s_dev_set(struct super_block *s, struct fs_context *fc)
 
 static int super_s_dev_test(struct super_block *s, struct fs_context *fc)
 {
-	return !(s->s_iflags & SB_I_RETIRED) &&
-		s->s_dev == *(dev_t *)fc->sget_key;
+	if (s->s_iflags & SB_I_RETIRED)
+		return false;
+
+	if (s->s_dev != *(dev_t *)fc->sget_key)
+		return false;
+
+	if (s->s_bdev && !disk_live(s->s_bdev->bd_disk))
+		return false;
+
+	return true;
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.39.2


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ