[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87a54zuojn.ffs@tglx>
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2025 12:47:24 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>, Henning Schild
<henning.schild@...mens.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar
<mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Guenter Roeck
<linux@...ck-us.net>, xenomai@...omai.org, guocai.he.cn@...driver.com,
pauld@...hat.com
Subject: Re: sched: Unexpected reschedule of offline CPU#2!
On Sat, Jul 19 2025 at 23:17, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 09 2025 at 09:44, Phil Auld wrote:
>> Hi Thomas,
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 05:27:58PM +0200 Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 27 2021 at 10:46, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>
>>> Picking up this dead thread again.
>>
>> Necro-ing this again...
>>
>> I keep getting occasional reports of this case. Unfortunately
>> though, I've never been able to reproduce it myself.
>>
>> Did the below patch ever go anywhere?
>
> Nope. Guocai said it does not work and I have no reproducer either to
> actually look at it deeper and there was further debug data provided.
Obviously:
no further debug data was provided, so I can only tap in the
dark.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists