linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: uvc: destroy worker when function is unbound

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2025072007-undoing-tingle-3b35@gregkh>
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2025 13:41:18 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: oushixiong <oushixiong1025@....com>
Cc: Michael Grzeschik <m.grzeschik@...gutronix.de>,
	Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov <snovitoll@...il.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Xu Yang <xu.yang_2@....com>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Shixiong Ou <oushixiong@...inos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: uvc: destroy worker when function is unbound

On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 05:30:52PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 11:29:36PM +0800, oushixiong wrote:
> > 
> > 在 2025/7/11 19:04, Greg Kroah-Hartman 写道:
> > > On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 04:35:50PM +0800,oushixiong1025@....com wrote:
> > > > From: Shixiong Ou<oushixiong@...inos.cn>
> > > > 
> > > > Destroy worker when function is unbound.
> > > This says what you did, but not why.
> > > 
> > > Why is this needed?  What happens without this change applied?
> > 
> > I think the kthread_worker created in uvcg_video_init() is not being
> > properly destroyed during the unbind phase.
> 
> Is this actually happening?  How was this noticed?  How was this tested?

Dropping from my review queue due to lack of response :(