[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d604104f-837d-34e2-ac62-261a8ccecfed@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2025 20:54:02 +0530
From: Shivendra Pratap <shivendra.pratap@....qualcomm.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Souvik Chakravarty <Souvik.Chakravarty@....com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Andy Yan <andy.yan@...k-chips.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
cros-qcom-dts-watchers@...omium.org, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
Mukesh Ojha <mukesh.ojha@....qualcomm.com>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Andre Draszik
<andre.draszik@...aro.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Elliot Berman <quic_eberman@...cinc.com>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srini@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 2/8] power: reset: reboot-mode: Add support for 64 bit
magic
On 7/20/2025 8:46 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 19, 2025 at 11:07:47PM +0530, Shivendra Pratap wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 7/19/2025 10:27 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>>>>>> +static int qcom_pon_reboot_mode_write(struct reboot_mode_driver *reboot, u64 magic)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> struct qcom_pon *pon = container_of
>>>>>> (reboot, struct qcom_pon, reboot_mode);
>>>>>> @@ -37,7 +36,7 @@ static int qcom_pon_reboot_mode_write(struct reboot_mode_driver *reboot,
>>>>>> ret = regmap_update_bits(pon->regmap,
>>>>>> pon->baseaddr + PON_SOFT_RB_SPARE,
>>>>>> GENMASK(7, pon->reason_shift),
>>>>>> - magic << pon->reason_shift);
>>>>>> + ((u32)magic) << pon->reason_shift);
>>>
>>> As a general rule of thumb, code with casts is poor quality code. Try
>>> to write the code without casts.
>>>
>>> Maybe something like
>>>
>>> If (magic > MAX_U32)
>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>
>>> magic_32 = magic;
>> sure will update it. And in above, should it be recommended to add a explicit
>> cast(for any avoiding any compiler complains)?
>> like: magic_32 = (u32)magic;
>
> I would hope the compiler/optimiser can figure out from the test the
> line before that this is a safe conversion. So i don't think you need
> a cast.
sure, thanks.
>
> Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists