lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aH0e3oyKvvOEkFCt@sidongui-MacBookPro.local>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2025 01:52:46 +0900
From: Sidong Yang <sidong.yang@...iosa.ai>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, io-uring@...r.kernel.org,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
	Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
	Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>,
	Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
	Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
	Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] rust: miscdevice: abstraction for uring-cmd

On Sun, Jul 20, 2025 at 06:41:06PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2025 at 6:07 PM Sidong Yang <sidong.yang@...iosa.ai> wrote:
> >
> > Although some existing kernel modules already use uring_cmd, they aren’t
> > implemented in Rust. Currently, no Rust code leverages this abstraction,
> > but it will enable anyone who wants to write kernel drivers in Rust using
> > uring_cmd.
> 
> Do you have a concrete user in mind?

Sadly, there isn’t a concrete user yet. I understand that an abstraction by itself
won’t be merged without a real in-tree user.
I’ll identify a suitable kernel module to port to Rust and follow up once I have one.

Thanks,
Sidong

> 
> i.e. I am asking because the kernel, in general, requires a user (in
> mainline) for code to be merged. So maintainers normally don't merge
> code unless it is clear who will use a feature upstream -- please see
> the last bullet of:
> 
>     https://rust-for-linux.com/contributing#submitting-new-abstractions-and-modules
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Cheers,
> Miguel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ