[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aH0zxwC8eJ2GhcXu@harshPC>
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2025 23:51:59 +0530
From: Harshal Wadhwa <embedkari167@...il.com>
To: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: shuah@...nel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] selftests: firmware: Add details in error logging
On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 03:39:47PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 7/14/25 15:26, Harshal wrote:
> > Specify details in logs of failed cases
>
> How about changing the above to:
>
> Improve error messages adding details on failuires
Will change this in next patch
> > fd = open(sys_path, O_WRONLY);
> > if (fd < 0)
> > - die("open failed: %s\n",
> > + die("open of sys_path failed: %s\n",
>
> Why not just use sys_path as a input parameter to die()?
Sure, that's great. Is there a way to test these changes ?
> > @@ -129,8 +129,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> > die("error: failed to build full fw_path\n");
> > setup_fw(fw_path);
> > -
>
> Why did you remove this line?
>
Will remove this change.
> > setvbuf(stdout, NULL, _IONBF, 0);
> > +
>
> Why is this line added
This too.
Thanks,
Harshal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists