lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ada00b1e-b717-4051-9b33-3f43b5c08097@amd.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2025 11:37:23 -0500
From: Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@....com>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Cc: andersson@...nel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] remoteproc: xlnx: disable unsupported features



On 7/21/25 10:24 AM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> Good morning,
> 
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 02:30:47PM -0700, Tanmay Shah wrote:
>> AMD-Xilinx platform driver does not support iommu or recovery mechanism
>> yet. Disable both features in platform driver.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@....com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c | 2 ++
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
>> index a51523456c6e..0ffd26a47685 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
>> @@ -938,6 +938,8 @@ static struct zynqmp_r5_core *zynqmp_r5_add_rproc_core(struct device *cdev)
>>   
>>   	rproc_coredump_set_elf_info(r5_rproc, ELFCLASS32, EM_ARM);
>>   
>> +	r5_rproc->recovery_disabled = true;
> 
> If recovery is not supported, and it is set explicitly here, does it mean the
> present upstream code is broken?  And if it is broken, how was this tested in
> the first place?

I think upstream code can be improved to change "recovery_disabled" to 
"recovery_enabled" and set it in each platform driver if feature is 
supported and keep it disabled by default.

When upstreaming base driver I wasn't aware that there is recovery 
feature in remoteproc until recently when I started working on it. I 
guess too focused on fixing base driver features. That is how I missed 
to add recovery_disabled and test it as well.

That is why it's better idea to replace "recovery_disabled" with 
"recovery_enabled" and keep recovery feature disabled by default. Same 
as "has_iommu". So platform drivers enable it if they actually support it.

I will add recovery feature for xlnx platform later, but until then it's 
better to disable it in the platform driver.

Thanks,
Tanmay

> 
>> +	r5_rproc->has_iommu = false;
>>   	r5_rproc->auto_boot = false;
>>   	r5_core = r5_rproc->priv;
>>   	r5_core->dev = cdev;
>> -- 
>> 2.34.1
>>


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ