lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b601d17a38a335afbe1398fc7248e4ec878cc1c6.camel@ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2025 17:04:17 +0000
From: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@....com>
To: "penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp" <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
        "willy@...radead.org" <willy@...radead.org>
CC: "glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de" <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>,
        "frank.li@...o.com" <frank.li@...o.com>,
        "slava@...eyko.com"
	<slava@...eyko.com>,
        "linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "akpm@...ux-foundation.org"
	<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] hfs: remove BUG() from
 hfs_release_folio()/hfs_test_inode()/hfs_write_inode()

On Fri, 2025-07-18 at 07:08 +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> On 2025/07/18 4:49, Viacheslav Dubeyko wrote:
> > I assume if we created the inode as normal with i_ino == 0, then we can make it
> > as a dirty. Because, inode will be made as bad inode here [2] only if rec->type
> > is invalid. But if it is valid, then we can create the normal inode even with
> > i_ino == 0.
> 
> You are right. The crafted filesystem image in the reproducer is hitting HFS_CDR_DIR with
> inode->i_ino = 0 ( https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.16-rc6/source/fs/hfs/inode.c#L363   ).

So, any plans to rework the patch?

Thanks,
Slava.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ