[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87h5z5tq51.ffs@tglx>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2025 19:22:50 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>, kernel test robot
<oliver.sang@...el.com>
Cc: oe-lkp@...ts.linux.dev, lkp@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/futex: Compile also on libnuma < 2.0.16
On Tue, Jul 15 2025 at 11:52, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> INCLUDES := -I../include -I../../ $(KHDR_INCLUDES)
> -CFLAGS := $(CFLAGS) -g -O2 -Wall -pthread $(INCLUDES) $(KHDR_INCLUDES)
> +CFLAGS := $(CFLAGS) -g -O2 -Wall -pthread $(INCLUDES) $(KHDR_INCLUDES) -DLIBUNMA_VER_$(LIBNUMA_TEST)=1
LIBUNMA?
> int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> {
> struct futex32_numa *futex_numa;
> - int mem_size, i;
> + int mem_size, i __maybe_unused;
Why this unused muck?
> +#ifdef LIBUNMA_VER_SUFFICIENT
> for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
if you can just do
for (int i = 0; ...
?
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists