[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250721141336.1491a3b5b09529171d65db6f@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2025 14:13:36 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, Linux Next Mailing List
<linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, George Abraham P
<george.abraham.p@...el.com>, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of all the trees
On Mon, 21 Jul 2025 14:42:22 +0300 Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > Is there any good reason not to do this?
> >
> > I guess this patch should have
> >
> > Fixes: 39ced19b9e60 ("lib/vsprintf: split out sprintf() and friends")
>
> This sounds correct to me and your patch should be sent as a fix to the stable
> kernels as well.
>
Yep, thanks, I added the cc:stable, queued it up and shall send to
Linus this week.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists