lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45ecb02603958fa6b741a87bc415ec2639604faa.camel@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2025 21:20:08 +0000
From: "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com>
To: "thomas.lendacky@....com" <thomas.lendacky@....com>, "tglx@...utronix.de"
	<tglx@...utronix.de>, "peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>, "Hansen,
 Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>, "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>, "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>
CC: "ashish.kalra@....com" <ashish.kalra@....com>, "Edgecombe, Rick P"
	<rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>, "seanjc@...gle.com" <seanjc@...gle.com>,
	"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "kas@...nel.org" <kas@...nel.org>, "Gao,
 Chao" <chao.gao@...el.com>, "Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Williams, Dan
 J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, "sagis@...gle.com" <sagis@...gle.com>,
	"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>, "kvm@...r.kernel.org"
	<kvm@...r.kernel.org>, "dwmw@...zon.co.uk" <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>, "Yamahata,
 Isaku" <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>, "nik.borisov@...e.com"
	<nik.borisov@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/7] x86/kexec: Consolidate relocate_kernel() function
 parameters

On Mon, 2025-07-21 at 09:40 -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> On 7/17/25 16:46, Kai Huang wrote:
> > During kexec, the kernel jumps to the new kernel in relocate_kernel(),
> > which is implemented in assembly and both 32-bit and 64-bit have their
> > own version.
> > 
> > Currently, for both 32-bit and 64-bit, the last two parameters of the
> > relocate_kernel() are both 'unsigned int' but actually they only convey
> > a boolean, i.e., one bit information.  The 'unsigned int' has enough
> > space to carry two bits information therefore there's no need to pass
> > the two booleans in two separate 'unsigned int'.
> > 
> > Consolidate the last two function parameters of relocate_kernel() into a
> > single 'unsigned int' and pass flags instead.
> > 
> > Only consolidate the 64-bit version albeit the similar optimization can
> > be done for the 32-bit version too.  Don't bother changing the 32-bit
> > version while it is working (since assembly code change is required).
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/include/asm/kexec.h         | 12 ++++++++++--
> >  arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c   | 22 +++++++++++++---------
> >  arch/x86/kernel/relocate_kernel_64.S | 19 +++++++++----------
> >  3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kexec.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kexec.h
> > index f2ad77929d6e..5f09791dc4e9 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kexec.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kexec.h
> > @@ -13,6 +13,15 @@
> >  # define KEXEC_DEBUG_EXC_HANDLER_SIZE	6 /* PUSHI, PUSHI, 2-byte JMP */
> >  #endif
> >  
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> > +
> > +#include <linux/bits.h>
> > +
> > +#define RELOC_KERNEL_PRESERVE_CONTEXT	BIT(0)
> > +#define RELOC_KERNEL_HOST_MEM_ACTIVE	BIT(1)
> 
> This isn't as descriptive with "ENC" removed from the name. It's almost
> like you read this and think it should always be 1 because the kernel
> always has host memory active.

Hi Tom,

Thanks for review.

Right.  I'll add "ENC" to the name.

> 
> > +
> > +#endif
> > +
> >  # define KEXEC_CONTROL_PAGE_SIZE	4096
> >  # define KEXEC_CONTROL_CODE_MAX_SIZE	2048
> >  
> > @@ -121,8 +130,7 @@ typedef unsigned long
> >  relocate_kernel_fn(unsigned long indirection_page,
> >  		   unsigned long pa_control_page,
> >  		   unsigned long start_address,
> > -		   unsigned int preserve_context,
> > -		   unsigned int host_mem_enc_active);
> > +		   unsigned int flags);
> >  #endif
> >  extern relocate_kernel_fn relocate_kernel;
> >  #define ARCH_HAS_KIMAGE_ARCH
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c
> > index 697fb99406e6..25cff38f5e60 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c
> > @@ -384,16 +384,10 @@ void __nocfi machine_kexec(struct kimage *image)
> >  {
> >  	unsigned long reloc_start = (unsigned long)__relocate_kernel_start;
> >  	relocate_kernel_fn *relocate_kernel_ptr;
> > -	unsigned int host_mem_enc_active;
> > +	unsigned int relocate_kernel_flags;
> >  	int save_ftrace_enabled;
> >  	void *control_page;
> >  
> > -	/*
> > -	 * This must be done before load_segments() since if call depth tracking
> > -	 * is used then GS must be valid to make any function calls.
> > -	 */
> > -	host_mem_enc_active = cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_HOST_MEM_ENCRYPT);
> > -
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_JUMP
> >  	if (image->preserve_context)
> >  		save_processor_state();
> > @@ -427,6 +421,17 @@ void __nocfi machine_kexec(struct kimage *image)
> >  	 */
> >  	relocate_kernel_ptr = control_page + (unsigned long)relocate_kernel - reloc_start;
> >  
> > +	relocate_kernel_flags = 0;
> > +	if (image->preserve_context)
> > +		relocate_kernel_flags |= RELOC_KERNEL_PRESERVE_CONTEXT;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * This must be done before load_segments() since if call depth tracking
> > +	 * is used then GS must be valid to make any function calls.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_HOST_MEM_ENCRYPT))
> > +		relocate_kernel_flags |= RELOC_KERNEL_HOST_MEM_ACTIVE;
> > +
> >  	/*
> >  	 * The segment registers are funny things, they have both a
> >  	 * visible and an invisible part.  Whenever the visible part is
> > @@ -443,8 +448,7 @@ void __nocfi machine_kexec(struct kimage *image)
> >  	image->start = relocate_kernel_ptr((unsigned long)image->head,
> >  					   virt_to_phys(control_page),
> >  					   image->start,
> > -					   image->preserve_context,
> > -					   host_mem_enc_active);
> > +					   relocate_kernel_flags);
> >  
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_JUMP
> >  	if (image->preserve_context)
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/relocate_kernel_64.S b/arch/x86/kernel/relocate_kernel_64.S
> > index ea604f4d0b52..1dfa323b33d5 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/relocate_kernel_64.S
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/relocate_kernel_64.S
> > @@ -66,8 +66,7 @@ SYM_CODE_START_NOALIGN(relocate_kernel)
> >  	 * %rdi indirection_page
> >  	 * %rsi pa_control_page
> >  	 * %rdx start address
> > -	 * %rcx preserve_context
> > -	 * %r8  host_mem_enc_active
> > +	 * %rcx flags: RELOC_KERNEL_*
> >  	 */
> >  
> >  	/* Save the CPU context, used for jumping back */
> > @@ -111,7 +110,7 @@ SYM_CODE_START_NOALIGN(relocate_kernel)
> >  	/* save indirection list for jumping back */
> >  	movq	%rdi, pa_backup_pages_map(%rip)
> >  
> > -	/* Save the preserve_context to %r11 as swap_pages clobbers %rcx. */
> > +	/* Save the flags to %r11 as swap_pages clobbers %rcx. */
> >  	movq	%rcx, %r11
> >  
> >  	/* setup a new stack at the end of the physical control page */
> > @@ -129,9 +128,8 @@ SYM_CODE_START_LOCAL_NOALIGN(identity_mapped)
> >  	/*
> >  	 * %rdi	indirection page
> >  	 * %rdx start address
> > -	 * %r8 host_mem_enc_active
> >  	 * %r9 page table page
> > -	 * %r11 preserve_context
> > +	 * %r11 flags: RELOC_KERNEL_*
> >  	 * %r13 original CR4 when relocate_kernel() was invoked
> >  	 */
> >  
> > @@ -204,7 +202,7 @@ SYM_CODE_START_LOCAL_NOALIGN(identity_mapped)
> >  	 * entries that will conflict with the now unencrypted memory
> >  	 * used by kexec. Flush the caches before copying the kernel.
> >  	 */
> > -	testq	%r8, %r8
> > +	testq	$RELOC_KERNEL_HOST_MEM_ACTIVE, %r11
> 
> Hmmm... can't both bits be set at the same time? If so, then this will
> fail. This should be doing bit tests now.

TEST instruction performs logical AND of the two operands, therefore the
above equals to:

	set ZF if "R11 AND BIT(1) == 0".

Whether there's any other bits set in R11 doesn't impact the above, right?
 
> 
> >  	jz .Lsme_off
> >  	wbinvd
> >  .Lsme_off:
> > @@ -220,7 +218,7 @@ SYM_CODE_START_LOCAL_NOALIGN(identity_mapped)
> >  	movq	%cr3, %rax
> >  	movq	%rax, %cr3
> >  
> > -	testq	%r11, %r11	/* preserve_context */
> > +	testq	$RELOC_KERNEL_PRESERVE_CONTEXT, %r11
> >  	jnz .Lrelocate
> >  
> >  	/*
> > @@ -273,7 +271,7 @@ SYM_CODE_START_LOCAL_NOALIGN(identity_mapped)
> >  	ANNOTATE_NOENDBR
> >  	andq	$PAGE_MASK, %r8
> >  	lea	PAGE_SIZE(%r8), %rsp
> > -	movl	$1, %r11d	/* Ensure preserve_context flag is set */
> > +	movl	$RELOC_KERNEL_PRESERVE_CONTEXT, %r11d	/* Ensure preserve_context flag is set */
> 
> And this will clear any value that was in r11 vs setting a single bit.
> Not sure it currently has any effect because r8 (where the memory
> encryption setting was held) is modified just before this. But if any
> bits are added in the future that are needed past here, this will be a
> problem.

Right.  It's just for the

	call swap_pages

right after it.  Nothing else later uses RELOC_KERNEL_PRESERVE_CONTEXT or
RELOC_KERNEL_HOST_MEM_ACTIVE.

Maybe we can add a comment to remind that all other flags are not restored
so if someone wants to add a new bit and use it at a later he/she can see?

	/*
	 * Ensure RELOC_KERNEL_PRESERVE_CONTEXT flag is set so swap_pages
	 * can do things correctly.  Note this doesn't restore any other 
	 * RELOC_KERNEL_* flags that were passed to relocate_kernel().
	 */
> 
> >  	call	swap_pages
> >  	movq	kexec_va_control_page(%rip), %rax
> >  0:	addq	$virtual_mapped - 0b, %rax
> > @@ -321,7 +319,7 @@ SYM_CODE_START_LOCAL_NOALIGN(swap_pages)
> >  	UNWIND_HINT_END_OF_STACK
> >  	/*
> >  	 * %rdi indirection page
> > -	 * %r11 preserve_context
> > +	 * %r11 flags: RELOC_KERNEL_*
> >  	 */
> >  	movq	%rdi, %rcx	/* Put the indirection_page in %rcx */
> >  	xorl	%edi, %edi
> > @@ -357,7 +355,8 @@ SYM_CODE_START_LOCAL_NOALIGN(swap_pages)
> >  	movq	%rdi, %rdx    /* Save destination page to %rdx */
> >  	movq	%rsi, %rax    /* Save source page to %rax */
> >  
> > -	testq	%r11, %r11    /* Only actually swap for ::preserve_context */
> > +	/* Only actually swap for ::preserve_context */
> > +	testq	$RELOC_KERNEL_PRESERVE_CONTEXT, %r11
> 
> Ditto here on the bit testing.

I don't see any problem?  Please see above.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ