linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/7] x86/kexec: Consolidate relocate

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1d2956ba8c7f0198ed76e09e2f1540d53c96815b.camel@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2025 21:36:48 +0000
From: "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com>
To: "thomas.lendacky@....com" <thomas.lendacky@....com>, "tglx@...utronix.de"
	<tglx@...utronix.de>, "peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>, "Hansen,
 Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>, "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>, "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>
CC: "Gao, Chao" <chao.gao@...el.com>, "Edgecombe, Rick P"
	<rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>, "seanjc@...gle.com" <seanjc@...gle.com>,
	"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "kas@...nel.org" <kas@...nel.org>,
	"sagis@...gle.com" <sagis@...gle.com>, "Chatre, Reinette"
	<reinette.chatre@...el.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	"nik.borisov@...e.com" <nik.borisov@...e.com>, "ashish.kalra@....com"
	<ashish.kalra@....com>, "pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
	"dwmw@...zon.co.uk" <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>, "kvm@...r.kernel.org"
	<kvm@...r.kernel.org>, "Yamahata, Isaku" <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/7] x86/kexec: Consolidate relocate_kernel() function
 parameters

On Mon, 2025-07-21 at 16:27 -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> > > > @@ -204,7 +202,7 @@ SYM_CODE_START_LOCAL_NOALIGN(identity_mapped)
> > > >   	 * entries that will conflict with the now unencrypted memory
> > > >   	 * used by kexec. Flush the caches before copying the kernel.
> > > >   	 */
> > > > -	testq	%r8, %r8
> > > > +	testq	$RELOC_KERNEL_HOST_MEM_ACTIVE, %r11
> > > 
> > > Hmmm... can't both bits be set at the same time? If so, then this will
> > > fail. This should be doing bit tests now.
> > 
> > TEST instruction performs logical AND of the two operands, therefore the
> > above equals to:
> > 
> >  	set ZF if "R11 AND BIT(1) == 0".
> > 
> > Whether there's any other bits set in R11 doesn't impact the above, right?
> >   
> 
> Doh! My bad, yes, not sure what I was thinking there.
> 

Np and thanks! I'll address your other comments but I'll see whether Boris
has any other comments first.