[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BL1PR11MB5525BEC30C6B9587C2DF23A0F75DA@BL1PR11MB5525.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2025 23:29:06 +0000
From: "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, "thomas.lendacky@....com"
<thomas.lendacky@....com>, "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>, "Hansen, Dave"
<dave.hansen@...el.com>, "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>
CC: "Gao, Chao" <chao.gao@...el.com>, "Edgecombe, Rick P"
<rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>, "seanjc@...gle.com" <seanjc@...gle.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "kas@...nel.org" <kas@...nel.org>,
"sagis@...gle.com" <sagis@...gle.com>, "Chatre, Reinette"
<reinette.chatre@...el.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
"nik.borisov@...e.com" <nik.borisov@...e.com>, "ashish.kalra@....com"
<ashish.kalra@....com>, "pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"dwmw@...zon.co.uk" <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>, "kvm@...r.kernel.org"
<kvm@...r.kernel.org>, "Yamahata, Isaku" <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 1/7] x86/kexec: Consolidate relocate_kernel() function
parameters
> On July 21, 2025 2:36:48 PM PDT, "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com> wrote:
> >On Mon, 2025-07-21 at 16:27 -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> >> > > > @@ -204,7 +202,7 @@
> SYM_CODE_START_LOCAL_NOALIGN(identity_mapped)
> >> > > > * entries that will conflict with the now unencrypted memory
> >> > > > * used by kexec. Flush the caches before copying the kernel.
> >> > > > */
> >> > > > - testq %r8, %r8
> >> > > > + testq $RELOC_KERNEL_HOST_MEM_ACTIVE, %r11
> >> > >
> >> > > Hmmm... can't both bits be set at the same time? If so, then this
> >> > > will fail. This should be doing bit tests now.
> >> >
> >> > TEST instruction performs logical AND of the two operands,
> >> > therefore the above equals to:
> >> >
> >> > set ZF if "R11 AND BIT(1) == 0".
> >> >
> >> > Whether there's any other bits set in R11 doesn't impact the above, right?
> >> >
> >>
> >> Doh! My bad, yes, not sure what I was thinking there.
> >>
> >
> >Np and thanks! I'll address your other comments but I'll see whether
> >Boris has any other comments first.
> >
>
> You can use testb in this case to save 3 bytes, too.
Yeah I can do that, thanks for the info!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists