[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <zuhyma5kafacf7zwszgww3ghc5dscyvuwj7csvmiqogbppavtd@z4q6ux5w7fao>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2025 10:11:20 +1000
From: Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Yonatan Maman <ymaman@...dia.com>, Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>, Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...dia.com>,
Michael Guralnik <michaelgur@...dia.com>, Or Har-Toov <ohartoov@...dia.com>,
Daisuke Matsuda <dskmtsd@...il.com>, Shay Drory <shayd@...dia.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Gal Shalom <GalShalom@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] mm/hmm: HMM API to enable P2P DMA for device
private pages
On Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 11:44:42AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 03:17:00PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 02:51:08PM +0300, Yonatan Maman wrote:
> > > +++ b/include/linux/memremap.h
> > > @@ -89,6 +89,14 @@ struct dev_pagemap_ops {
> > > */
> > > vm_fault_t (*migrate_to_ram)(struct vm_fault *vmf);
> > >
> > > + /*
> > > + * Used for private (un-addressable) device memory only. Return a
> > > + * corresponding PFN for a page that can be mapped to device
> > > + * (e.g using dma_map_page)
> > > + */
> > > + int (*get_dma_pfn_for_device)(struct page *private_page,
> > > + unsigned long *dma_pfn);
> >
> > This makes no sense. If a page is addressable then it has a PFN.
> > If a page is not addressable then it doesn't have a PFN.
>
> The DEVICE_PRIVATE pages have a PFN, but it is not usable for
> anything.
>
> This is effectively converting from a DEVICE_PRIVATE page to an actual
> DMA'able address of some kind. The DEVICE_PRIVATE is just a non-usable
> proxy, like a swap entry, for where the real data is sitting.
Yes, it's on my backlog to start looking at using something other than a real
PFN for this proxy. Because having it as an actual PFN has caused us all sorts
of random issues as it still needs to reserve a real physical address range
which may or may not be available on a given machine.
>
> Jason
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists