lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aH4PRnuztKTqgEYo@yilunxu-OptiPlex-7050>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2025 17:58:30 +0800
From: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@...ux.intel.com>
To: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
Cc: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@...gle.com>, Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@...el.com>,
	Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@...gle.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@....com>,
	Fuad Tabba <tabba@...gle.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, ajones@...tanamicro.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, amoorthy@...gle.com,
	anthony.yznaga@...cle.com, anup@...infault.org,
	aou@...s.berkeley.edu, bfoster@...hat.com,
	binbin.wu@...ux.intel.com, brauner@...nel.org,
	catalin.marinas@....com, chao.p.peng@...el.com,
	chenhuacai@...nel.org, dave.hansen@...el.com, david@...hat.com,
	dmatlack@...gle.com, dwmw@...zon.co.uk, erdemaktas@...gle.com,
	fan.du@...el.com, fvdl@...gle.com, graf@...zon.com,
	haibo1.xu@...el.com, hch@...radead.org, hughd@...gle.com,
	isaku.yamahata@...el.com, jack@...e.cz, james.morse@....com,
	jarkko@...nel.org, jgowans@...zon.com, jhubbard@...dia.com,
	jroedel@...e.de, jthoughton@...gle.com, jun.miao@...el.com,
	kai.huang@...el.com, keirf@...gle.com, kent.overstreet@...ux.dev,
	kirill.shutemov@...el.com, liam.merwick@...cle.com,
	maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com, mail@...iej.szmigiero.name,
	maz@...nel.org, mic@...ikod.net, michael.roth@....com,
	mpe@...erman.id.au, muchun.song@...ux.dev, nikunj@....com,
	nsaenz@...zon.es, oliver.upton@...ux.dev, palmer@...belt.com,
	pankaj.gupta@....com, paul.walmsley@...ive.com, pbonzini@...hat.com,
	pdurrant@...zon.co.uk, peterx@...hat.com, pgonda@...gle.com,
	pvorel@...e.cz, qperret@...gle.com, quic_cvanscha@...cinc.com,
	quic_eberman@...cinc.com, quic_mnalajal@...cinc.com,
	quic_pderrin@...cinc.com, quic_pheragu@...cinc.com,
	quic_svaddagi@...cinc.com, quic_tsoni@...cinc.com,
	richard.weiyang@...il.com, rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com,
	rientjes@...gle.com, roypat@...zon.co.uk, rppt@...nel.org,
	seanjc@...gle.com, shuah@...nel.org, steven.price@....com,
	steven.sistare@...cle.com, suzuki.poulose@....com,
	thomas.lendacky@....com, usama.arif@...edance.com, vbabka@...e.cz,
	viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, vkuznets@...hat.com, wei.w.wang@...el.com,
	will@...nel.org, willy@...radead.org, xiaoyao.li@...el.com,
	yilun.xu@...el.com, yuzenghui@...wei.com, zhiquan1.li@...el.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 04/51] KVM: guest_memfd: Introduce
 KVM_GMEM_CONVERT_SHARED/PRIVATE ioctls

> > > >> Yan, Yilun, would it work if, on conversion,
> > > >> 
> > > >> 1. guest_memfd notifies IOMMU that a conversion is about to happen for a
> > > >>    PFN range
> > > >
> > > > It is the Guest fw call to release the pinning.
> > > 
> > > I see, thanks for explaining.
> > > 
> > > > By the time VMM get the
> > > > conversion requirement, the page is already physically unpinned. So I
> > > > agree with Jason the pinning doesn't have to reach to iommu from SW POV.
> > > >
> > > 
> > > If by the time KVM gets the conversion request, the page is unpinned,
> > > then we're all good, right?
> > 
> > Yes, unless guest doesn't unpin the page first by mistake.
> 
> Or maliciously?  :-(

Yes.

> 
> My initial response to this was that this is a bug and we don't need to be
> concerned with it.  However, can't this be a DOS from one TD to crash the
> system if the host uses the private page for something else and the
> machine #MC's?

I think we are already doing something to prevent vcpus from executing
then destroy VM, so no further TD accessing. But I assume there is
concern a TD could just leak a lot of resources, and we are
investigating if host can reclaim them.

Thanks,
Yilun

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ