[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6e737bd5-1167-4cc8-96c3-abc3d3598d2d@efficios.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2025 09:25:15 -0400
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
To: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Stephen Röttger <sroettger@...gle.com>,
peterz@...radead.org, boqun.feng@...il.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, hpa@...or.com, aruna.ramakrishna@...cle.com,
elver@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/4] rseq: Make rseq work with protection keys
On 2025-07-18 05:01, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2025 at 11:17, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com> wrote:
>>>> If an application registers rseq, and ever switches to another pkey
>>>> protection (such that the rseq becomes inaccessible), then any
>>>> context switch will cause failure in __rseq_handle_notify_resume()
>>>> attempting to read/write struct rseq and/or rseq_cs. Since context
>>>> switches are asynchronous and are outside of the application control
>>>> (not part of the restricted code scope), temporarily switch to
>>>> pkey value that allows access to the 0 (default) PKEY.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
>>>> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
>>>> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
>>>> Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
>>>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>>>> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
>>>> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
>>>> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
>>>> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
>>>> Cc: Aruna Ramakrishna <aruna.ramakrishna@...cle.com>
>>>> Cc: x86@...nel.org
>>>> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
>>>> Fixes: d7822b1e24f2 ("rseq: Introduce restartable sequences system call")
>>>
>>> Dave, can you please ack this patch? Ingo said he was waiting for your
>>> review before taking this to -tip.
>>
>> Are there any remaining concerns with this series? If not, Thomas,
>> Ingo, can you please take this to -tip tree?
>
> Gentle ping. What needs to happen for this series to be merged?
This series looks OK from my perspective. I think the last piece that
was missing was to get a review from Dave Hansen.
Dave ?
Thanks,
Mathieu
>
>
>>>> ---
>>>> Changes in v7:
>>>> - Added Mathieu's Reviewed-by
>>>>
>>>> Changes in v6:
>>>> - Added a comment to struct rseq with MPK rules
>>>>
>>>> Changes in v4:
>>>> - Added Fixes tag
>>>>
>>>> Changes in v3:
>>>> - simplify control flow to always enable access to 0 pkey
>>>>
>>>> Changes in v2:
>>>> - fixed typos and reworded the comment
>>>> ---
>>>> include/uapi/linux/rseq.h | 4 ++++
>>>> kernel/rseq.c | 11 +++++++++++
>>>> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/rseq.h b/include/uapi/linux/rseq.h
>>>> index c233aae5eac90..019fd248cf749 100644
>>>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/rseq.h
>>>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/rseq.h
>>>> @@ -58,6 +58,10 @@ struct rseq_cs {
>>>> * contained within a single cache-line.
>>>> *
>>>> * A single struct rseq per thread is allowed.
>>>> + *
>>>> + * If struct rseq or struct rseq_cs is used with Memory Protection Keys,
>>>> + * then the assigned pkey should either be accessible whenever these structs
>>>> + * are registered/installed, or they should be protected with pkey 0.
>>>> */
>>>> struct rseq {
>>>> /*
>>>> diff --git a/kernel/rseq.c b/kernel/rseq.c
>>>> index b7a1ec327e811..88fc8cb789b3b 100644
>>>> --- a/kernel/rseq.c
>>>> +++ b/kernel/rseq.c
>>>> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>>>>
>>>> #include <linux/sched.h>
>>>> #include <linux/uaccess.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/pkeys.h>
>>>> #include <linux/syscalls.h>
>>>> #include <linux/rseq.h>
>>>> #include <linux/types.h>
>>>> @@ -424,11 +425,19 @@ static int rseq_ip_fixup(struct pt_regs *regs)
>>>> void __rseq_handle_notify_resume(struct ksignal *ksig, struct pt_regs *regs)
>>>> {
>>>> struct task_struct *t = current;
>>>> + pkey_reg_t saved_pkey;
>>>> int ret, sig;
>>>>
>>>> if (unlikely(t->flags & PF_EXITING))
>>>> return;
>>>>
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * Enable access to the default (0) pkey in case the thread has
>>>> + * currently disabled access to it and struct rseq/rseq_cs has
>>>> + * 0 pkey assigned (the only supported value for now).
>>>> + */
>>>> + saved_pkey = enable_zero_pkey_val();
>>>> +
>>>> /*
>>>> * regs is NULL if and only if the caller is in a syscall path. Skip
>>>> * fixup and leave rseq_cs as is so that rseq_sycall() will detect and
>>>> @@ -441,9 +450,11 @@ void __rseq_handle_notify_resume(struct ksignal *ksig, struct pt_regs *regs)
>>>> }
>>>> if (unlikely(rseq_update_cpu_node_id(t)))
>>>> goto error;
>>>> + write_pkey_val(saved_pkey);
>>>> return;
>>>>
>>>> error:
>>>> + write_pkey_val(saved_pkey);
>>>> sig = ksig ? ksig->sig : 0;
>>>> force_sigsegv(sig);
>>>> }
>>>> --
>>>> 2.49.0.1143.g0be31eac6b-goog
>>>>
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
https://www.efficios.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists