[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250721143814.waTN9e5C@linutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2025 16:38:14 +0200
From: Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>
To: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Tomas Glozar <tglozar@...hat.com>, Juri Lelli <jlelli@...hat.com>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/14] verification/rvgen: Organise Kconfig entries
for nested monitors
On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 10:23:18AM +0200, Gabriele Monaco wrote:
> The current behaviour of rvgen when running with the -a option is to
> append the necessary lines at the end of the configuration for Kconfig,
> Makefile and tracepoints.
> This is not always the desired behaviour in case of nested monitors:
> while tracepoints are not affected by nesting and the Makefile's only
> requirement is that the parent monitor is built before its children, in
> the Kconfig it is better to have children defined right after their
> parent, otherwise the result has wrong indentation:
>
> [*] foo_parent monitor
> [*] foo_child1 monitor
> [*] foo_child2 monitor
> [*] bar_parent monitor
> [*] bar_child1 monitor
> [*] bar_child2 monitor
> [*] foo_child3 monitor
> [*] foo_child4 monitor
>
> Adapt rvgen to look for a different marker for nested monitors in the
> Kconfig file and append the line right after the last sibling, instead
> of the last monitor.
> Also add the marker when creating a new parent monitor.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@...hat.com>
Some nitpicks below. But regardless:
Reviewed-by: Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>
> - def __patch_file(self, file, marker, line):
> + def _patch_file(self, file, marker, line):
> + assert(self.auto_patch)
Nit: follows PEP8 unless there is a reason not to: assert self.auto_patch
> file_to_patch = os.path.join(self.rv_dir, file)
> content = self._read_file(file_to_patch)
> content = content.replace(marker, line + "\n" + marker)
> @@ -146,7 +147,7 @@ class RVGenerator:
> def fill_tracepoint_tooltip(self):
> monitor_class_type = self.fill_monitor_class_type()
> if self.auto_patch:
> - self.__patch_file("rv_trace.h",
> + self._patch_file("rv_trace.h",
> "// Add new monitors based on CONFIG_%s here" % monitor_class_type,
> "#include <monitors/%s/%s_trace.h>" % (self.name, self.name))
> return " - Patching %s/rv_trace.h, double check the result" % self.rv_dir
> @@ -156,10 +157,15 @@ Add this line where other tracepoints are included and %s is defined:
> #include <monitors/%s/%s_trace.h>
> """ % (self.rv_dir, monitor_class_type, self.name, self.name)
>
> + def _container_marker(self, container = None) -> str:
> + return "# Add new %smonitors here" % (container + " "
> + if container else "")
PEP8: container=None
And this function name is misleading, it is not marker for only containers.
Perhaps _kconfig_marker() is more appropriate.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists