[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAO9wTFjkTbwiT3vCVX9j2UwFdF947NbxpUpzB9iyPcxYxARtUA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 20:18:21 +0530
From: Suchit K <suchitkarunakaran@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
horms@...nel.org, jhs@...atatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
jiri@...nulli.us, sdf@...ichev.me, kuniyu@...gle.com,
aleksander.lobakin@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
skhan@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Revert tx queue length on partial failure in dev_qdisc_change_tx_queue_len()
> Please note that in networking we ask that new versions of patches not
> be resubmitted within 24h of previous posting:
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/maintainer-netdev.html
>
Yup, thanks for reminding.
> > In the meantime, could you please give me some insights on testing
> > this change? Also, apart from the unsigned int blunder, does the
> > overall approach look reasonable? I’d be grateful for any suggestions
> > or comments. Thank you.
>
> Hopefully someone reviews before you repost, I didn't look further once
> I noticed the static analysis warning.
Alright, I'll wait until someone reviews it. Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists