[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=Mfg42wvT9qdYrhvFq_wdvThmWpbvvo-p9bHSsyK0pn+bw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 16:52:02 +0200
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: David Thompson <davthompson@...dia.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linus.walleij@...aro.org, davem@...emloft.net, asmaa@...dia.com,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Shravan Kumar Ramani <shravankr@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] gpio-mlxbf2: only get IRQ for device instances 0 and 3
On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 6:22 PM David Thompson <davthompson@...dia.com> wrote:
>
> The gpio-mlxbf2 driver interfaces with four GPIO controllers,
> device instances 0-3. There are two IRQ resources shared between
> the four controllers, and they are found in the ACPI table for
> device instances 0 and 3. The driver should not attempt to get
> an IRQ resource when probing device instance 1 or 2, otherwise
> the following error is logged:
> mlxbf2_gpio MLNXBF22:01: error -ENXIO: IRQ index 0 not found
>
> Fixes: 2b725265cb08 ("gpio: mlxbf2: Introduce IRQ support")
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: David Thompson <davthompson@...dia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Shravan Kumar Ramani <shravankr@...dia.com>
> ---
> v3: added version history
> v2: added tag "Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org"
>
> drivers/gpio/gpio-mlxbf2.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mlxbf2.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mlxbf2.c
> index 6f3dda6b635f..fc56ac81e344 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mlxbf2.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mlxbf2.c
> @@ -353,7 +353,9 @@ mlxbf2_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct gpio_chip *gc;
> unsigned int npins;
> const char *name;
> + char *colon_ptr;
> int ret, irq;
> + long num;
>
> name = dev_name(dev);
>
> @@ -397,26 +399,40 @@ mlxbf2_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> gc->ngpio = npins;
> gc->owner = THIS_MODULE;
>
> - irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> - if (irq >= 0) {
> - girq = &gs->gc.irq;
> - gpio_irq_chip_set_chip(girq, &mlxbf2_gpio_irq_chip);
> - girq->handler = handle_simple_irq;
> - girq->default_type = IRQ_TYPE_NONE;
> - /* This will let us handle the parent IRQ in the driver */
> - girq->num_parents = 0;
> - girq->parents = NULL;
> - girq->parent_handler = NULL;
> -
> - /*
> - * Directly request the irq here instead of passing
> - * a flow-handler because the irq is shared.
> - */
> - ret = devm_request_irq(dev, irq, mlxbf2_gpio_irq_handler,
> - IRQF_SHARED, name, gs);
> - if (ret) {
> - dev_err(dev, "failed to request IRQ");
> - return ret;
> + colon_ptr = strchr(dev_name(dev), ':');
> + if (!colon_ptr) {
> + dev_err(dev, "invalid device name format\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + ret = kstrtol(++colon_ptr, 16, &num);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "invalid device instance\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
That is *really* fragile. Andy, Mika: does this look remotely correct
to you? I don't know much about ACPI systems.
Bart
> + if (!num || num == 3) {
> + irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> + if (irq >= 0) {
> + girq = &gs->gc.irq;
> + gpio_irq_chip_set_chip(girq, &mlxbf2_gpio_irq_chip);
> + girq->handler = handle_simple_irq;
> + girq->default_type = IRQ_TYPE_NONE;
> + /* This will let us handle the parent IRQ in the driver */
> + girq->num_parents = 0;
> + girq->parents = NULL;
> + girq->parent_handler = NULL;
> +
> + /*
> + * Directly request the irq here instead of passing
> + * a flow-handler because the irq is shared.
> + */
> + ret = devm_request_irq(dev, irq, mlxbf2_gpio_irq_handler,
> + IRQF_SHARED, name, gs);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to request IRQ");
> + return ret;
> + }
> }
> }
>
> --
> 2.30.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists