[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9b64b787-81bb-4a87-8d4d-3879a116b9d4@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 10:23:34 -0500
From: Shree Ramamoorthy <s-ramamoorthy@...com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
CC: <aaro.koskinen@....fi>, <andreas@...nade.info>, <khilman@...libre.com>,
<rogerq@...nel.org>, <tony@...mide.com>, <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, <m-leonard@...com>, <praneeth@...com>,
<jcormier@...ticallink.com>, <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/2] Add TI TPS65214 PMIC GPIO Support
On 7/22/2025 7:33 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 1:32 AM Shree Ramamoorthy <s-ramamoorthy@...com> wrote:
>> The related MFD series was integrated in mainline during 6.15 cycle [0].
>>
>> TPS65214 is a Power Management Integrated Circuit (PMIC) that has
>> significant register map overlap with TPS65219. The series introduces
>> TPS65214 and restructures the existing driver to support multiple devices.
>>
>> TPS65215's GPIO specs are the same as TPS65219, so the "tps65219-gpio"
>> compatible string is assigned to two devices in the TPS65219 MFD driver.
>> No additional support is required in the GPIO driver for TPS65215.
>>
>> - TPS65214 has 1 GPIO & 1 GPO, whereas TPS65219/TPS65215 both have 1 GPIO &
>> 2 GPOs.
>> - TPS65214' GPIO direction can be changed with register GENERAL_CONFIG and
>> bit GPIO_CONFIG during device operation.
>> - TPS65219's MULTI_DEVICE_ENABLE bit in register MFP_1_CFG maps to
>> TPS65214's GPIO_VSEL_CONFIG bit.
>>
>> TPS65214 Datasheet: https://www.ti.com/lit/gpn/TPS65214
>> TPS65214 TRM: https://www.ti.com/lit/pdf/slvud30
>> TPS65215 TRM: https://www.ti.com/lit/pdf/slvucw5/
>>
>> Tested on Jon Cormier's AM62x platform with TPS65219.
>> GPIO offsets remained consistent and functional.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shree Ramamoorthy <s-ramamoorthy@...com>
>> Tested-by: Jonathan Cormier <jcormier@...ticallink.com>
>> ---
> This doesn't apply on top of my gpio/for-next branch. Do you think you
> can quickly submit another iteration rebased on top of it?
Will rebase and re-submit! Would I send it as v7 RESUBMIT or v8?
>
> Bartosz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists